[ih] Correct name for early TCP/IP working group?
Jack Haverty
jack at 3kitty.org
Tue Jan 28 23:33:47 PST 2025
Short answer -- yes, well before 1983.
The planning for 1/1/1983 began before sometime before 21 September
1981. That was the date of the first ICCB meeting. My notes from that
meeting contain a list of technical issues that had to be worked out in
anticipation of the "Jan 83 System (heavy load)".
The ARPANET was managed at that point by DCA, as an operational
network. So the task of getting ready for TCP fell on the guy in charge
at DCA, who was Joe Haughney. I'm not sure of all that he did, but he's
the one who set the 1/1/1983 date for the cutover.
Joe's daughter Christine recently (2023) put together a podcast "The
untold history of how the internet almost didn't happen", which contains
more details about who did what during that timeframe. It's still online at:
https://www.inc.com/computerfreak I don't recall everything in there
(IIRC I'm on it a little bit too), but it might make a good historical
resource, containing a view from the operations perspective. On the
podcast, Joe explains, somewhat gleefully, that he was the one who
picked New Year's Eve for the cutover.
There was a *lot* of preparatory work before that cutover, which turned
out to be somewhat boring. We had engineers and programmers standing by
to fix whatever problems occurred. But after "the switch" was thrown
--- nothing much happened.
For example, NBS (now NIST) created a program for testing new TCP
implementations to make sure they followed the spec. At BBN, in
preparation for the later DDN activity, we set up a service which would
run the NBS tests for clients (using a dialup link), and then help them
as consultants to fix whatever wasn't working. There was lots of work
to convert older programs like Telnet, FTP, and mail to use TCP instead
of NCP, and to get ancillary, but important, technologies such as SNMP
and ICMP widely implemented.
Thanks to ARPA, TCP had already been implemented for many different
types of computers, so the task was in many cases just getting the
various owners of ARPANET machines to put TCP into their systems. A
threat (actually promise) was made that after the cutover date, NCP
connections would no longer work at all. That was apparently enough
motivation.
It took well over a year, but the cutover went smoothly. IMHO that was
directly due to the advance planning and related work to get ready. The
cutover got all the attention, but the work beforehand made it successful.
I don't really remember what machines had TCP over what schedules. But
DCA ran the ARPANET and had SRI with Jake Feinler managing the "NIC"
(Network Information Center) on SRI-KL. That's where I'd expect to find
lists of machines (e.g., the HOSTS.TXT file that was used before DNS
existed), as well as the DCA Newsletters which came out periodically and
captured the status of the ARPANET and computers attached to it. All
that kind of information would have come from the NIC.
Jack
On 1/28/25 22:04, Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> Jack Haverty wrote:
>> SATNET, and ARPANET, were both continuously managed by the NOC at
>> BBN. TCP, and a collection of "core gateways" had become increasingly
>> important to users, especially in the UK in Peter Kirstein's group,
>> which had to rely on TCP through SATNET to access computers in the US.
> This would have been before 1983, correct? I'm curious which
> (important) computers were avaiable through TCP?
>
> It seems to me the transition from NCP to TCP was somewhat gradual.
> Many histories make a big deal out of the 1/1/83 flag day, as if the
> entire network switched from NCP-only on one day, to TCP-only the next
> day. But reading more carefully, I gather some hosts were TCP only or
> dual TCP/NCP long before that. Is that correct?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 665 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/internet-history/attachments/20250128/f0d67f98/attachment.asc>
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list