[ih] More terminology (Was: multi-protocol routers, bridges)
John Day
jeanjour at comcast.net
Thu Dec 2 17:21:20 PST 2021
Okay, I stand corrected.
> On Dec 2, 2021, at 20:18, Vint Cerf <vint at google.com> wrote:
>
> uh, that's not what I remember. Blue boxes and Cap'n Crunch whistles took over the inband audio signalling system until out of band control was introduced.
>
> v
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 7:54 PM John Day via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
> The phone system has always separated control and ‘data’ in separate networks. The drawing of planes originates with ISDN
>
> I have looking for a good definition for years.
>
> > On Dec 2, 2021, at 18:07, Greg Skinner via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Nov 27, 2021, at 6:46 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org <mailto:cabo at tzi.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28. Nov 2021, at 00:32, Noel Chiappa via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org <http://elists.isoc.org/>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We distinguished between two very different activities which 'routers'
> >>> performed; the handling of user traffic, which we called 'forwarding', and the
> >>> computation of routing data/tables (by routing protocols/algorithms), which
> >>> was often (but not always, IIRC) called 'routing'. (Slightly confusing, I
> >>> know! :-)
> >>
> >> Indeed, but both meanings of ?routing? prevail.
> >> I?ll call them routing1 and routing2, where routing1 is defined as the combination of routing2 and fowarding.
> >>
> >> We?ll use routing1 when describing the overall outcome, as in ?xyz does not route that traffic?, or in ?router?.
> >>
> >> We?ll use routing2 together with forwarding when it comes to how to implement routing1; RIB and FIB are clear examples of distinct concepts relating to routing2 and forwarding. Routing protocols rarely provide forwarding and therefore are routing2.
> >> (A router that uses strict source routing or an SDN setup does not do routing2 at all?)
> >>
> >> The terms control plane and data plane are another attempt to slice this cake; I must admit I don?t know when those gained popularity.
> >>
> >> Gr??e, Carsten
> >>
> >
> > I was curious about the origins of control and data plane myself, so I looked into it a bit. Their use dates back to at least the early 1990s. For example, see the 1991 CCITT (ITU) publication B-ISDN Protocol Reference Model and its Application, Recommendation I.321 <http://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-I.321-199104-I!!PDF-E&type=items <http://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-I.321-199104-I!!PDF-E&type=items>>. As an example of when it entered the IETF vernacular, see a message from 1994 that was posted to the ATM list <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/atm/MELrqzESZnZZFCZsjpb_ZNRcjPY/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/atm/MELrqzESZnZZFCZsjpb_ZNRcjPY/>> in response to a question about RFC 1577.
> >
> > —gregbo
> >
> > --
> > Internet-history mailing list
> > Internet-history at elists.isoc.org <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
> > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history>
>
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history>
>
>
> --
> Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
> Vint Cerf
> 1435 Woodhurst Blvd
> McLean, VA 22102
> 703-448-0965
>
> until further notice
>
>
>
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list