[ih] "historical" RFCs as a way to publish ih history not behind a paywall

[dave walden]

I think it is a good option to figure out how to make work.

For anyone who cares, I have a long plea for practitioners to work more 
explicitly to capture history:
https://walden-family.com/texland/tb128walden-noticing.pdf  <= a 
preprint; I believe the print issue is on its way to readers now.

On 9/14/2020 6:34 AM, Brian Carpenter wrote:
> "historic" tends to mean "obsolete" as an RFC label. They could just 
> be labelled "informational" l think. But there are other issues (no 
> photos, for example).
>
> Regards
>     Brian
>     (via tiny screen & keyboard)
>
>