[ih] The Sub-atomic Physics of The Internet

[Bob Hinden]

Hi Jack,

We always had the idea of multiple applications on the Internet.   As you point out

  TCP/IP, which formed the basic "glue" of The Internet

I don’t see an issue with different applications (planets in this article), and in this model one gets to be on as many planets as one wants at the same time.   Seems to me some of the separation driven by different languages, I am unlikely to use an app that is focused on content in a language I don’t understand.

The two big things I worry about are that many of the large application platforms are owned by the same company (that is, Facebook owns Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, WhatsApp), and that the TCP/IP Internet is getting more divided as countries block content at their borders.

Bob




> On Aug 29, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Jack Haverty via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> My apologies - yes, I should have looked to Astronomy rather than
> Physics on seeing that graphic.
> 
> The deja vu experience I was trying to relate was from two historical
> seminal events.
> 
> One was in the late 60s, when many sites, usually universities, had
> computer facilities, and one could "choose" which to use, usually by
> choosing an institution to join.   The movers and shakers at ARPA had
> multiple terminals, one for each institution they were sponsoring, and
> it was tedious to constantly shift back and forth to interact with their
> remote colleagues.   To address that issue, ARPA created the ARPANET.
> 
> Through the 70s and 80s, other network technologies appeared, and one
> could choose which to use, and interact with others on that network.
> But some projects required interactions between different networks.  So
> ARPA created TCP/IP, which formed the basic "glue" of The Internet.
> 
> Now, in 2020, dozens of large social media "platforms" have evolved,
> built on The Internet, yet it is very tedious to interact across their
> boundaries (as Dave Crocker illustrated).   AFAIK, no one has yet
> created the "SocialNet" to glue them all together.
> 
> I agree choice is a good thing.  It allows one to pick a mechanism most
> suited to your own needs.  It fosters competition and survival of the
> fittest.
> 
> But one particular "choice" has been very popular - the choice of using
> a mechanism that integrates the various "planets" into a cohesive
> community.  In the 70s, the ARPANET grew explosively because it provided
> that cohesion among diverse computers.  In the 90s, the Internet
> similarly exploded across the world, integrating all sorts of physical
> networks.
> 
> Now we have a lot of "planets" again.   There are even more
> "planetesimals" if you consider all the forums and discussion groups,
> media publications with hyperactive "comments" areas, and other such
> closed communities.   Personally, I find it virtually impossible to keep
> track of it all, and not miss things that I really should see.   I don't
> seem to have the choice of using a cohesive interface to multiple
> planets.   At least I haven't found it.
> 
> My deja vu sense tells me that it's a similar situation to that at the
> time of the ARPANET and Internet emergence.  ARPA seems to have gone on
> to other things, so I just wonder who will continue the pattern of
> Internet History.  And if.
> 
> /Jack Haverty
> 
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/internet-history/attachments/20200901/bdbbdf8f/attachment.asc>