[ih] Any suggestions for first uses of "e-mail" or "email"?
jeanjour at comcast.net
Sat Aug 8 07:21:45 PDT 2015
Yes, I remember.
It is (and was) still pretty amusing. IEEE does it all the time and has for a very long time.
> On Aug 8, 2015, at 10:11, John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote:
>> On Aug 8, 2015, at 8:48 AM, John Day <jeanjour at comcast.net> wrote:
>> Pretty amusing, considering ITU had nothing to do with its development. It was all done in ISO meetings.
> (Apologies - that was my subconscious (and errant) substitution of the boogeyman du jour… )
> The discussion that took place was regarding potential for IETF to lack change control vis-a-vis
> the ISO process, and it turns out to be fairly well covered in final IPng recommendation doc
> (RFC1752) -
> " There seems to be a profound disagreement within the TUBA community
> over the question of the ability of the IETF to modify the CLNP standards.
> In our presentation in Houston we said that we felt that "clone and run”
> was a legitimate process. This is also what the IAB proposed in "IP version 7”.
> [IAB92] The TUBA community has not reached consensus that this view is
> reasonable. While many, including a number of the CLNP document authors,
> are adamant that this is not an issue and the IETF can make modifications
> to the base standards, many others are just as adamant that the standards
> ca only be changed through the ISO standards process. Since the
> overwhelming feeling within the IETF is that the IETF must 'own' the
> standards on which it is basing its future, this disagreement within
> the TUBA community was disquieting.
> i.e. we came close to use of ISO-CLMP protocol for the Internet at large, but in the
> end went in a different direction primarily due to reasons that were not technical.
More information about the Internet-history