[ih] "Subnet"

[dave.walden.family at gmail.com]

On May 10, 2012, at 7:11 PM, "Bernie Cosell" <bernie at fantasyfarm.com> wrote:
> Well, I don't think there was any 'subnet'ing with the ARPAnet 

Well, I vaguely remember there was in some other sense -- logical subnets, a seldom used, if ever, feature where the IMPs could let a subset of hosts only communicate with each other.  Or, instead of a vague memory, do I have a wrong memory?    (Of course this is irrelevant to the distinction previously being discussed.)
>