[ih] Hesitating to disagree with one of the fathers of the Internet…..

[Vint Cerf]

so, we need to distinguish the subnet from the host on the ARPANET.
The latter were the subject of much debate from the participating
sites. The design of the IMP system, on the other hand was really BBN.
If you really think Mike disagreed with that, you must imply that he
had a rather odd model of what the "ARPANET" was.

vint



On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:58 PM, David Elliott Bell
<bell1945 at offthisweek.com> wrote:
> nevertheless, I would point out that not everyone agreed that
>
> "BBN was the designer and operator of the ARPANET from the outset to its
> termination in 1990."
>
> The disagreement would be over the phrase "the designer".
>
> Michael Padlipsky clearly did not agree. per his book The Elements of
> Networking Style (& Other Essays & Animadversions of the Art of
> Intercomputer Networking. (Peter Salus continues to have a high opinion of
> this book, which includes the only reference on Wikipedia to the Arpanet
> Reference Model.)
>
> One of the chapters in that book "And They Argued All Night...."  posited
> that much of what happened in the early days of the Arpanet was the result
> of group discussion where the participants did not always themselves
> remember who said what and where ideas came from.
>
> I recommend his book for some reflection of the life and times of the early
> days of ARPA's Network Working Group (?  phrasing right?).
>
> David Bell
>