[ih] Some Questions over IPv4 Ownership

[John Day]

You are focusing too much on the how and not the what.  It should be 
in terms of the service.  You don't want to control where it is 
routed, you want to ensure where it is not routed.

So if China is off limits, can I divert it through North Korea?  What 
about Congo?
  ;-)

At 19:51 -0700 2010/10/14, Richard Bennett wrote:
>  Well, yeah, X.25 or something like MPLS. My point was that I don't 
>want the route from Comcast.net to Bennett.com to go through China. 
>Not so much unique routes as user-controlled ones.
>
>On 10/14/2010 7:10 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>>lawyers, but it doesn't make them irrelevant. The Internet's global system
>>>of addressing requires a central authority to ensure address and route
>>>uniqueness; that's something we have to live with.
>>Addressing yes, routing no. With unique routes we'll all be screwed
>>and back to X.25
>>
>>Cheers
>>- J
>
>--
>Richard Bennett