[ih] principles of the internet
Dave Crocker
dcrocker at gmail.com
Tue Jun 1 10:38:25 PDT 2010
On 6/1/2010 10:23 AM, John Day wrote:
> However, I would disagree with him that all
> application protocols must be asymmetrical.
Perhaps some other Dave posted what you are responding to, and I missed it, but
if you mean my note: I never made such a claim.
I made a statistical assertion of what is and has been -- as you also note --
but not what must be.
> It is the case that once an asymmetrical protocol is introduced into an
> architecture, it makes very difficult to build anything on top of it.
like HTTP?
> The running code/rough consensus is probably one of the more important
> aspects of driving the Internet to a artisan tradition rather than a
> more scientific one. This is has probably contributed most to the
> stagnation we currently see.
>
> An odd complement to the aversion to complexity, there seems to be an
> aversion to sophistication that leads to greater simplicity.
I assume that the goal of this exercise requires ignoring the rather remarkable
complexity that has crept into much of the recent work in the IETF?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list