[ih] Cluster Addressing and CIDR
David P. Reed
dpreed at reed.com
Wed Jan 15 07:08:31 PST 2003
At 03:16 PM 1/14/2003 -0800, Joe Touch wrote:
>Doing things that violate private rights for the "public good," despite
>the current fashion, are detestable.
Copyright exists ONLY for the public good. If it fails to improve the
public good, and serves only private interests, the Government should no
longer provide it. It's not a natural law, it is merely a synthetic
construct, constructed and enforced by the Government.
There are no "private rights" to transmit information to others, but then
constrain what they do with it.
The most interesting analogy is in the patent law. Once you share an
invention with others, you lose the right to exclude, unless you use
patents, in which case you gain a purely synthetic right for a very limited
time, crafted entirely because of a public good argument.
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list