[Chapter-delegates] Internet Society Statement on the NETmundial Initiative

[Livingood, Jason]

On 11/19/14, 9:58 AM, "Sivasubramanian M" <isolatedn at gmail.com<mailto:isolatedn at gmail.com>> wrote:
@Raul  It is not well understood that this is NOT our final position, and a bit of negative publicity has resulted and a few other actors have used this announcement to campaign against NETmundial.

It is not about NETmundial, it is about the newly proposed NETmundial Initiative, something quite different.

I regret that you feel it put us in a negative position but we strongly disagreed with the entire top-down concept of oversight of the group.

Some questions I have:

1 – Do you agree that the IANA transition is a very important priority for us to continue to focus on?

2 – Are there major “Internet governance” issues that cannot be addressed by existing groups – OR are being insufficiently addressed by existing groups?

3 – If so, what are those issues?

Thanks!
Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20141119/cbebf6e9/attachment.htm>