[Chapter-delegates] Internet Society Statement on the NETmundial Initiative

[Carlos Raúl G.]

1- YES
2- YES 
3- regional traffic Infraestructure and local market conditions for access 

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8335 2487
Enviado desde mi iPhone

> El nov 19, 2014, a las 12:57 PM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com> escribió:
> 
> On 11/19/14, 9:58 AM, "Sivasubramanian M" <isolatedn at gmail.com> wrote:
> @Raul  It is not well understood that this is NOT our final position, and a bit of negative publicity has resulted and a few other actors have used this announcement to campaign against NETmundial.
> 
> It is not about NETmundial, it is about the newly proposed NETmundial Initiative, something quite different. 
> 
> I regret that you feel it put us in a negative position but we strongly disagreed with the entire top-down concept of oversight of the group. 
> 
> Some questions I have:
> 
> 1 – Do you agree that the IANA transition is a very important priority for us to continue to focus on?
> 
> 2 – Are there major “Internet governance” issues that cannot be addressed by existing groups – OR are being insufficiently addressed by existing groups?
> 
> 3 – If so, what are those issues?
> 
> Thanks!
> Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20141119/6817e211/attachment.htm>