[Chapter-delegates] LoA for good or bad?

[John More]

Veni

To the  contrary, the "idea" is not bad, but the sequence is.  Either in an LoA or in the bylaws, the responsibilities of the Chapters and a means for resolving them (or in the unlikely possibility of revoking a Chapter's charter) should be set forth.  No organization can afford to have rogue chapters. I assume you do not believe there should be no control.

John
 


On Mar 24, 2012, at 6:42 AM, Veni Markovski wrote:

> Isoc HQ has no control over the Isoc members. The LoA gives exactly that, what they cannot have vis-a-vis the members. There is no reason to discuss the LoA - it is an idea, which turned out to be bad, and not coming on time (it should come as an exchange of letters, but AFTER Isoc changes its by-laws). 
> 
> V. 
> 
> On Saturday, March 24, 2012, Grigori Saghyan <gregor at arminco.com> wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> >> Where are chapters in this model? Chapters are subgroups of members.
> >
> > Why these subgroups have to sign a LoA?
> > Let us observe a case, when there is only one member (participant?) in
> > the Chapter, who also represents the subgroup - as an extreme case.
> > In this case there is no need to sign the LoA, because this person has
> > already accepted ISOC membership conditions.
> >
> > Better to describe, how to involve  ISOC member from the area, where any
> > Chapter is active  into named Chapter - formally. May be double membership?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grigori Saghyan
> > PGP Key ID: 0x48E4D5DC
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Best,
> Veni
> == Sent from my phone, so any spelling mistakes are caused by the touchscreen keyboard. That's a nice excuse, isn't it;-)
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20120324/dfbef081/attachment.htm>