[Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new gTLDs?

[Luisa Gueifão]

Hi,

We also believe that DNSSEC should be mandatory for new gTLDs

Regards,

Luisa Lopes Gueifao
ISOC Portugal Chapter


-----Original Message-----
From: chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org
[mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org] On Behalf Of Carlos M.
Martinez
Sent: sexta-feira, 8 de Abril de 2011 14:24
To: chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new
gTLDs?

Speaking strictly on my own:

- I do believe DNSSEC should be mandatory for new gTLDs.

The cost argument against DNSSEC doesn't hold water after gTLD sponsors have
spent several hundred thousand dollars in the whole process.

regards

Carlos

On 4/7/11 6:07 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> The subject says it all.
> A discussion is currently taking place in ICANN's At-Large community 
> whether DNSSEC should be or should not be mandatory for all new gTLDs.
>
> Proponents of the mandatory inclusion say that it will make every new 
> gTLD more secure.
> Proponents of the optional inclusion say that it is too costly and 
> should be chosen on a case by case basis, if it makes commercial sense.
>
> I'd like to hear the opinions of Internet Society chapters, please.
Thanks!
>
> Olivier
>
_______________________________________________
Chapter-delegates mailing list
Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates