[Chapter-delegates] Should DNSSEC be mandatory for all new gTLDs?

[Jordi Iparraguirre]

Olivier,

i'm not speaking on behalf of isoc-cat chapter but for on behalf of
the .cat registry.
I agree on what's being said about being compulsory for new TLDs, but
the main issue right now is that Registrars are not offering it for
the current TLDs that already have it; they still say "there is no
demand"....

I'd put the accent on getting the Registrars implementing it first
(also for IPv6)

thanks for asking
jordi


2011/4/7 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>:
> The subject says it all.
> A discussion is currently taking place in ICANN's At-Large community
> whether DNSSEC should be or should not be mandatory for all new gTLDs.
>
> Proponents of the mandatory inclusion say that it will make every new
> gTLD more secure.
> Proponents of the optional inclusion say that it is too costly and
> should be chosen on a case by case basis, if it makes commercial sense.
>
> I'd like to hear the opinions of Internet Society chapters, please. Thanks!
>
> Olivier
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>



-- 
Jordi Iparraguirre