[Chapter-delegates] The Future Internet

[William F. Slater, III]

Sivasubramanian,

Thanks!  The Kevin Kelly video was excellent!!!

Kevin Kelly has been one of my heroes since his great books, Out of
Control and the New Rules of the New Economy.

Best regards,

Bill
William F. Slater, III, PMP
President, ISOC-Chicago
Program Manager / Data Center Manager
1337 N. Ashland Ave. No. 2
Chicago, IL 60622
United States of America

slater at billslater.com
http://billslater.com
http://billslater.com/WFS_Business_Card_Front_2009.JPG
773 - 235 - 3080 - Home
312 - 758 - 0307 - Mobile


On Thu, May 7, 2009 12:04 am, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:
> Hello Oliver,
>
> What are the visions of the Internet Future that are in conformity with
> the
> Internet values?  Lynn St Amour has talked about the Internet Model as
> part
> of her speeches in various forums, Vint Cerf has briefly outlined a
> prediction, but is there an ISOC-like document on the Future of Internet?
> Or, more precisely, what OUGHT TO be the Future of the Internet? Has ISOC
> spelt out its vision? Or are there any documents that ISOC considers as
> outlines in conformity with the Internet values?As we see wrong ideas such
> as the ITU's erroneous ideas on the Future of Internet gets published it
> is
> important, not only to counter that by comments and email debates, but
> more
> effectively by preparing a blue print, complete with arguments as to how
> telecoms and other businesses can prosper well within the Internet Model
> and
> with arguments to show how Security concerns could be addressed without
> introducing draconian legislations. If we don't have one, it is time we
> prepared one.
>
> Visions of the future are always fascinating, but only a very few people
> can
> see through how a certain program or proposal would upset the Internet
> model. I have recently posted two videos in the chapter blog
> http://isocmadras.blogspot.com from TED. One is a Talk by Kevin Kelly on
> the
> "next 5000 days of the Web", which is very interesting as a blog post.
> There
> are several such resources, but which of these visions could be dubbed as
> the right concepts and inspirations?  What is right and what is wrong?
>
> May be we need an INET with the theme "Future of the Internet"?
>
>
> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> http://turiya.wordpress.com
> Blog: http://isocmadras.blogspot.com
>
> facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
> LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
> Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz
> Airtel: +91 99524 03099
>
>
>
>
> 2009/5/7 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
>
>>  Hey everyone,
>>
>> The ITU has recently released a free document (Hip hip hurray! Finally a
>> free document from ITU !), describing their vision of The Future
>> Internet.
>> This might not be their sole vision, but it is one vision.
>>
>> http://www.itu.int/oth/T230100000A/en
>>
>> I have found the document to be interesting reading. However, I have
>> found
>> several instances where a question is raised for the sole purpose to
>> instill
>> doubt in the reader's mind wrt the Internet being able to evolve. Is
>> this a
>> special writing style? Is this wanted? There are plenty of question
>> marks
>> looming about the subject.
>> Another interesting part is Annex A, where the authors provide a list of
>> the current ITU-T study groups working on Internet-related matters. It
>> looks
>> like a well orchestrated choice of subjects. Is ITU planting its fence
>> posts
>> in the standards field, in time for future networks? Indeed, can I ask a
>> burning question: is there Internet space for two standards bodies -
>> IETF &
>> ITU - in those subjects?
>>
>> Of particular importance is the last line of the conclusion:
>>
>> "As a result, this Report has surveyed the debate over Internet
>> architecture, and identified key emerging trends and features of the
>> Internet, in an attempt to provide pointers for future standards work
>> for
>> consideration by the ITU-T membership and the broader standards
>> community. "
>>
>> So the ITU's back on the forefront of Internet-related standards - or at
>> least, it plans to be.
>>
>> I'd be interested in hearing what others think about this document.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> --
>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
>> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chapter-delegates mailing list
>> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Chapter-delegates mailing list
> Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
>


--