[Chapter-delegates] The Future Internet
Mike Todd
miketodd at miketodd.com
Thu May 7 06:40:00 PDT 2009
Oliver,
My thought is that the IETF ought to offer an invitation to ITU to participate in the official Internet Standards process just as other organizational members have provided unencumbered RFC types of interactions.
In a World that appears to be experiencing increasing pressures for all sorts of turmoil, this is not the time for major organizations, be they political, social, governmental, commercial or any other sort of grouping, to try to start yet another unneeded battle for supremacy. Just my $.02.
Mike Todd
President, Mike Todd Associates - www.MikeTodd.com
President, Internet Society Los Angeles Chapter - www.ISOC-LA.org
toddm at isoc-la.org
Founder, Digital Divide Task Force, www.ddtf.org (undergoing updates)
miketodd at ddtf.org
Western Trade Adjustment Assistance Center (Western TAAC)
Phoenix, Arizona program expansion center
Western Research Application Center, Viterbi School of Engineering,
University of Southern California
----- Original Message -----
From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
To: Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 16:49
Subject: [Chapter-delegates] The Future Internet
Hey everyone,
The ITU has recently released a free document (Hip hip hurray! Finally a free document from ITU !), describing their vision of The Future Internet. This might not be their sole vision, but it is one vision.
http://www.itu.int/oth/T230100000A/en
I have found the document to be interesting reading. However, I have found several instances where a question is raised for the sole purpose to instill doubt in the reader's mind wrt the Internet being able to evolve. Is this a special writing style? Is this wanted? There are plenty of question marks looming about the subject.
Another interesting part is Annex A, where the authors provide a list of the current ITU-T study groups working on Internet-related matters. It looks like a well orchestrated choice of subjects. Is ITU planting its fence posts in the standards field, in time for future networks? Indeed, can I ask a burning question: is there Internet space for two standards bodies - IETF & ITU - in those subjects?
Of particular importance is the last line of the conclusion:
"As a result, this Report has surveyed the debate over Internet architecture, and identified key emerging trends and features of the Internet, in an attempt to provide pointers for future standards work for consideration by the ITU-T membership and the broader standards community. "
So the ITU's back on the forefront of Internet-related standards - or at least, it plans to be.
I'd be interested in hearing what others think about this document.
Kind regards,
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Chapter-delegates mailing list
Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20090507/c4a8513a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Chapter-delegates
mailing list