[Chapter-delegates] ooXML

[veni markovski]

Unfortunately the Bulgarian Standards Institute 
has accepted "yes with comments". I am afraid 
that when you have only ISOC-Bulgaria trying to 
change things, it doesn't really happen (that 
easy), esp. that it's a cause understanded by only a small group of people.

btw, does anyone know how ISO is accepting these standards? With consensus?

veni

At 16:16 8/23/2007  +0200, Wе┌adysе┌aw Majewski wrote:
>Borka,
>
>thanks for good laugh!
>
> > I have  my national standardisation
> > committee (I am  chairing)  meeting on which we
> > will take our decision regarding the JTC 1 inquiry
> > about possible contradiction between ooXML submitted
> > standard by MS via ECMA on the fast track
> > procedure  next week.
>
>Sorry for teaching the national standarisation committee chair but I
>hope you understand that only NO answer has sound meaning.
>
>"No with comments" really means "conditionally YES"
>"Yes with comments" really means "yes, you are not required to read our
>comments"
>"Yes" means "I am blind and do not need to read this damn specification".
>
>rgds
>
>Wladek
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Chapter-delegates mailing list
>Chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org
>http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/chapter-delegates