[Chapter-delegates] IETF Journal latest edition

[Fred Baker]

yes and no. The total amount of funds is the same as it was, and is  
100/30 times as large as it was before; there is also a funding  
source (IETF meeting fees) that underwrites the portion CNRI has  
handled up until now.

The big issue there is that should a temporary underflow occur, ISOC  
has to pick up the difference, where CNRI used to.

On your last question, pleas refer to the 2004 and 2006 budgets.

On Jan 18, 2006, at 2:43 AM, Jacek Gajewski wrote:

> Dear Fred,
>
> Fred Baker wrote:
>> Functionally, the net result is that ISOC, in the person of the  
>> IASA,  is now responsible for 100% of IETF funding, not ~30%, is  
>> much more  closely related to the IETF than ever before.
>
> Does the above change of funding of IETF by ISOC from 30% to 100%  
> affects the ammount of funds, which ISOC spends on IETF?
>
> And if yes, how big (in % of total ISOC budget and in absolute  
> numbers) was the spending of ISOC on IETF before and after the  
> above change?
>
> With the kindest regards,
> Jacek Gajewski