[chapter-delegates] Patent on IPv6

[Franck Martin]

Veni,

I know I'm knocking an open door with you, but chapter delegates need to 
know... It is done...

Cheers

Veni Markovski wrote:

> At 11:14 31-03-05  +1200, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying they should go against a org member in this case, but 
>> that having ISOC not represented in WIPO and WTO, leave IETF at risk. 
>> This was an example of such risk... I'm sure there are others, but 
>> they did not make it to the press....
>
>
> You are knocking on an open door. You don't need to make me or Patrick 
> understand this. We both have been and are working with governments 
> and inter-governmental organizations. You should address other people 
> on that topic.
>
>
>> Well, are we coming back to the money for vote issue? If they are org 
>> member I think we should speak to them if we feel they are wrong and 
>> we are doing something right, if they do't understand or do not want 
>> to discuss, I think it is fair to escalate, but as org member I think 
>> we can solve the issue internally. Finally, I think ISOC should be 
>> able to take any org member to task too, they are supposed to follow 
>> a code of conduct too with ISOC/IETF.
>
>
> Oh, come on Franck... You should know well by now what are the big 
> interests of ISOC - and they are all around the standards pillar, the 
> IETF restrcuturing, etc. These are the big interests, and they get all 
> the real funding.
>
> v.


-- 
Franck Martin
ICT Specialist
franck at sopac.org
SOPAC, Fiji
GPG Key fingerprint = 44A4 8AE4 392A 3B92 FDF9  D9C6 BE79 9E60 81D9 1320
"Toute connaissance est une reponse a une question" G.Bachelard

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20050331/8eb8b0ec/attachment.asc>