[chapter-delegates] FYI - in the coming discussion of the WGIG questionnaire

[cdel at firsthand.net]

TeddyAP wrote:
> At 05:21 PM 6/7/2005, cdel at firsthand.net wrote:
>> Fred Baker wrote:
>>> On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:
>>>> Suggesting that WSIS/WGIG wants to dismantle ICANN and is a danger 
>>>> for the free Internet is plain FUD.
>> This should NOT be about anti-US sentiment! Indeed the US should be 
>> thanked for its gestation of Internet to the world. Actually the 
>> number of prizes heaped on Vint and Bob is a testament to the 
>> enormous regard that peoples around the world have for what they and 
>> the US have achieved with the Internet.
>>
>> However a corporation serving under US law remains within US 
>> jurisdiction. We may have to live with this until such time as ICANN 
>> can become institutionalised as a Treaty organisation or we can find 
>> other ways to internationalise ICANN.
>
> I have an idea about ISOC Treaty,
> Its posted:
> http://www.isoc-id.org/01_isoctreaty.php
>
> ISOC HQ should be a moderator, how to implement it.
>
> -teddy
>
I know that feelings run high but can I query your wording in Article 7?
*Article 7

*
The Information Industry links between the G-15 countries shall be used 
as extensively as possible for the raped and reliable transmission of 
Information Industries.1

:-)

Christian