[chapter-delegates] FYI - in the coming discussion of the WGIG questionnaire

[TeddyAP]

At 08:02 PM 6/7/2005, cdel at firsthand.net wrote:
>TeddyAP wrote:
>>At 05:21 PM 6/7/2005, cdel at firsthand.net wrote:
>>>Fred Baker wrote:
>>>>On Jun 6, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:
>>>>>Suggesting that WSIS/WGIG wants to dismantle ICANN and is a danger for 
>>>>>the free Internet is plain FUD.
>>>This should NOT be about anti-US sentiment! Indeed the US should be 
>>>thanked for its gestation of Internet to the world. Actually the number 
>>>of prizes heaped on Vint and Bob is a testament to the enormous regard 
>>>that peoples around the world have for what they and the US have 
>>>achieved with the Internet.
>>>
>>>However a corporation serving under US law remains within US 
>>>jurisdiction. We may have to live with this until such time as ICANN can 
>>>become institutionalised as a Treaty organisation or we can find other 
>>>ways to internationalise ICANN.
>>
>>I have an idea about ISOC Treaty,
>>Its posted:
>>http://www.isoc-id.org/01_isoctreaty.php
>>
>>ISOC HQ should be a moderator, how to implement it.
>>
>>-teddy
>I know that feelings run high but can I query your wording in Article 7?
>*Article 7
>
>*
>The Information Industry links between the G-15 countries shall be used as 
>extensively as possible for the raped and reliable transmission of 
>Information Industries.1

Its open to be revised by the moderator;-)
Tx

-teddy


>:-)
>
>Christian