[chapter-delegates] Re: [MemberPubPol] ISOC and WGIG report

[avri doria]

Hi,

I have been away from the Internet for a week and am only now catching 
up.

I agree that this is a great idea and encourage people to read both the 
report and the background report if they have the time.

While I think informed comment is best, it might also be worth setting 
up a poll on the various models proposed where someone can state simply 
which, if any, of the models they agree with.

ISOC can have a very strong voice, but it has to be seen as vox populi 
and not just the voice of experts.

a.

On 29 jun 2005, at 13.23, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> Il giorno mer, 29-06-2005 alle 12:16 +0200, Patrick Vande Walle ha
> scritto:
>> Ian Peter wrote:
>>
>>> However I am concerned about merely polling the members. There is a 
>>> great
>>> deal of misinformation about WGIG and UN at present
>
>> This is a concern to me as well. I know some people are allergic to 
>> the
>> word "UN"  and dismiss the WSIS process based on the fact that the UN
>
> To be brief... I think it is a great idea (and in case it is 
> practically
> undoable to poll all individual members, you should at least do it at
> the Chapters level). Also, I share Ian's concern; perhaps a good idea
> would be to attach to the request for an opinion a sort of short
> informative leaflet that would be written by the supporters of the
> different options.
> -- 
> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Memberpubpol mailing list
> Memberpubpol at elists.isoc.org
> http://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/memberpubpol
>