[ih] IPv8...

John Kristoff jtk at dataplane.org
Tue Apr 21 10:26:59 PDT 2026


On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:46:51 -0400
John Day <jeanjour at comcast.net> wrote:

> I presume there then has to be some method for notifying stations and
> links that they should be willing?

Yes, this has most commonly involved IGMP and PIM.  IGMP for hosts and
routers to report and learn group membership on a link.  PIM to
construct the forwarding path overlay (basically you route away from
the source where there are interested receivers).

> Seems to be an unnecessary complication.

Not sure about unnecessary, but a complication... yes sir, especially
for inter-domain deployment, which has largely been abandoned by most
networks.  You still find deployments within certain environments for
mass OS imaging, IP TV, and the stock-ticker sort of applications.

> (Applications shouldn’t have to specifically request multicast. The
> provider determines whether to simply send n copies or use multicast.
> It is the provide that benefits, not the application.)

As implemented a host needs to know to listen on the group address and
it needs to signal the network there is a group listener.  I'd guess if
you don't want the OS/app involved there would need to be some sort of
proxy near group members that perform all this.  This is probably close
enough to what CDNs do already.

John


More information about the Internet-history mailing list