[ih] Why did TCP win? [Re: Internet-history Digest, Vol 63, Issue 3
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Mon Feb 3 17:51:34 PST 2025
On 04-Feb-25 11:02, Dave Crocker via Internet-history wrote:
>
>> I believe that was to use TCP/IP as the transport since you couldn't
>> count on an OSI implementation.
>
> When people claim that Internet folk were antagonistic to OSI, they
> conveniently leave out efforts like Rose's ISODE.
>
> Arguably, Internet folk did a lot more to try to make OSI useful than
> the OSI community did.
Right. For example, at CERN we deployed EAN (freeware from UBC), which
attempted to bridge X.400 and RFC822. It supported RFC987. I was still
expecting X.400 to take off in 1989, but a couple of years later I recall
writing a script to convert EAN's file structure into MBOX format as
our few remaining EAN users (including me) wanted to convert to ELM.
If you really want a flavour of the email mess in those days, here's
a CERN internal status report:
http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/2806521/files/Dimou-email-status-report-1989.pdf
Brian
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list