[ih] Internet Protocol Implementation Guide
vinton cerf
vgcerf at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 06:53:13 PDT 2025
wouldn't that depend on either the strength of the error check or digital
signature or decryption algorithm?
v
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:49 AM John Day via Internet-history <
internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> Wouldn’t that be susceptible to a substitution attack?
>
> > On Aug 21, 2025, at 09:21, Vint Cerf via Internet-history <
> internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> >
> > David, it was always believed that segments might have to be decrypted
> out
> > of order if they were encrypted - that was an important design criterion
> > for packet cryptography but maybe you are thinking of something else? We
> > assumed the reassembly would take place within a buffer window so they
> > could be placed in the right part of the buffer before assembly was
> > completed and the result delivered to the next layer up.
> >
> > v
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 9:09 AM David Finnigan via Internet-history <
> > internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 20 Aug 2025 4:17 pm, Barbara Denny via Internet-history wrote:
> >>> Quite some time ago I sent email out with links to the handbooks
> >>> produced by the NIC at SRI. I don't remember if that email also
> >>> included the Internet Protocol Implementation Guide. Sending this
> >>> message in case this document wasn't included.
> >>> https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA153624.pdf
> >>> The end of the document has an interesting snapshot of the status of
> >>> TCP/IP implantations as of June 8, 1982.
> >>> barbara
> >>
> >> While looking at the sources for some early TCP implementations, I
> >> noticed that some of them will process most TCP controls out of order
> >> (except FIN), so long as the segment sequence fits within the receive
> >> window. Segment text is always kept in sequence to be delivered to the
> >> user in correct order, of course.
> >>
> >> Who was the one to notice that this was possible, when RFC 793 states
> >> that segments "are generally queued and processed in sequence number
> >> order" ?
> >> --
> >> Internet-history mailing list
> >> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> >> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> >> -
> >> Unsubscribe:
> >>
> https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
> > Vint Cerf
> > Google, LLC
> > 1900 Reston Metro Plaza, 16th Floor
> > Reston, VA 20190
> > +1 (571) 213 1346
> >
> >
> > until further notice
> > --
> > Internet-history mailing list
> > Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> > -
> > Unsubscribe:
> https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history
>
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> -
> Unsubscribe:
> https://app.smartsheet.com/b/form/9b6ef0621638436ab0a9b23cb0668b0b?The%20list%20to%20be%20unsubscribed%20from=Internet-history
>
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list