[ih] NBS seminar on TCP/IP (was TCP RTT Estimator)
Barbara Denny
b_a_denny at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 25 17:43:38 PDT 2025
Anyone out there know what happened to a project I think was called SAPE ( Strategic Adaptive Planning Experiments(?)). The RFP was in the early to mid 80s and could have had some interesting networking stuff to look at. I worked on the proposal more than once: SRI kept having to rewrite the proposal because things kept getting contested by bidders? if I remember right. I think the RFP changed enough over time that SRI dropped out in the bidding process so I never heard what happened.
barbara
On Friday, April 25, 2025 at 04:03:12 PM PDT, Karl Auerbach via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
On 4/25/25 3:17 PM, Greg Skinner via Internet-history wrote:
> So far, based on what I’ve read, I don’t see any evidence that the concerns of the military, or users of lossy networks, were given insufficient consideration.
For a while (circa 1972/73), while at SDC, I worked on projects for the
US Joint Chiefs of Staff.
We were working on packet switched networking issues, mostly for
tactical communications. And we were highly concerned with lossy
networks - not only in terms of packet loss (or corruption) but also
with the loss of physical assets, such as routers/gateways disappearing
(usually accompanied by a loud "boom" from conventional explosives or
intense X-rays from a nuclear blast - the "cold war" was running rather
hot at the time.)
(We were also concerned with the physical capture of operating packet
switching devices or the links between them. I remember one project
where we were concerned about loss of devices due to them being dropped
into the mud by tired Marines slogging across a battlefield.)
This was well before the advent of TCP but the idea of highly dynamic
routing of store-and-forward packets was well accepted as the right road
forward.
Much of what I saw during those years was hidden behind cone-of-silence
upon cone-of-silence - Our world was "we don't talk about it" or
"everything is classified". (I even got dinged for publishing a piece
based only on open source/unclassified materials.)
So it would not be surprising that the academic and tech communities
that were not inside our security walls did not hear us loudly
expressing our concerns.
--karl--
--
Internet-history mailing list
Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list