[ih] Question re rate of growth of the Arpanet

[Johan Helsingius]

On 21/04/2025 22:15, the keyboard of geoff goodfellow via 
Internet-history wrote:

> then there was UUCP... can anyone chime in what the "minimum" acceptable
> bit rate for that was?  anything less than Bell 202 at 1.2 or Racal Vadic
> at 2.4?

Pretty much, yes. Leaf nodes could survive on a 1200 bps connection,
but I don't think I ever saw anything slower.

	Julf