[ih] Tell me about host names and 3com
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Tue Jan 16 18:20:21 PST 2024
Yes but, but, 1123 is *host* requirements and 952 was about /etc/hosts.
(FYA, I just checked and Windows 10 allows entries in C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts that start with a digit.)
1123 didn't update 1035, which is about domain names. Maybe that should be submitted as an erratum.
(Yes, I did read some of the namedroppers thread that was cited, and the argument about whether host names are different from domain names is hardly new.)
Regards
Brian
On 17-Jan-24 12:29, Andrew Sullivan via Internet-history wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 02:37:28PM -0500, John Levine via Internet-history wrote:
>
>> Does anyone remember the details? RFC1035 is still the official
>> standard for hostnames, and the initial letter rule has been wrong for
>> a long time.
>
> Hi,
>
> What you want is RFC 1123, section 2.1:
>
>
> The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952
> [DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the
> restriction on the first character is relaxed to allow either a
> letter or a digit. Host software MUST support this more liberal
> syntax.
>
> Bob Braden actually referred to this to me in a conversation one time as "the 3Com exception".
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list