[ih] Email reliability

[Frantisek Borsik]

+1

“I think the only real question is whether their ultimate plan is to battle
it out between them, once they’ve destroyed email for everyone else, or
whether they’re planning to remain a duopoly, so that they can pretend that
there’s competition.”

Why is that even called conspiracy?
There are many fields and verticals that suffer from the same delusion of
competition.
And in fact, all we ever get is some duopoly, monopoly or something similar.

Heck, it’s basically everywhere.


All the best,

Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik at gmail.com


On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 8:55 PM, John Levine via Internet-history <
internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:

> It appears that Bill Woodcock via Internet-history <woody at pch.net> said:
> >Ultimately, though, they’re not trying to get anyone else to do what they
> say, they’re trying to get everyone else to give up on trying to reach their
> >arbitrarily moving goalposts.
> >
> >I think the only real question is whether their ultimate plan is to
> battle it out between them, once they’ve destroyed email for everyone else,
> or whether
> >they’re planning to remain a duopoly, so that they can pretend that
> there’s competition.
>
> I know a lot of people who work for large mail providers and even for
> (egad) Spamhaus.
>
> While this kind of conspiracy nonseense is fun, it's not very useful or
> productive.
>
> R's,
> John
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>