[ih] 'internet' and "Internet"

[touch at strayalpha.com]

—
Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist
www.strayalpha.com

> On Aug 7, 2023, at 9:09 PM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: touch at strayalpha.com
> To: dcrocker at bbiw.net
> CC: Jack Haverty <jack at 3kitty.org>; Internet History list <internet-history at elists.isoc.org>; Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net>
> Date: Aug 7, 2023 7:25:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [ih] 'internet' and "Internet"
> 
>> On Aug 7, 2023, at 7:09 PM, Dave Crocker via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 8/7/2023 6:14 PM, Jack Haverty via Internet-history wrote:
>>> But I don't know what is "practice" today.   Do corporations still have their own private internets?   Or have they actually all migrated to the Internet and somehow addressed all of the security concerns?
>> 
>> I suggest a simple basis for answering this:
>> 
>> 1. Posit 'global' operational semantics.  Ports, DNS, etc.
> 
> https://www.strayalpha.com/internet-rights/
> 
>> 2. If a network constrains or alters that semantic, it is an Internet,
>>   but is not (fully) part of /the/ Internet.
> 
> It *could be* an internet. The question is what’s “an internet” at that point - just using IP won’t work as a definition. 
> 
> But yeah, IMO, basically.
> 
> Joe
> 
> Why?

Others pointed out - too many other ways to create partitions.

I gave details and reasons in the list above. 

Joe