[ih] "The First Router" on Jeopardy
Toerless Eckert
tte at cs.fau.de
Wed Nov 24 10:31:37 PST 2021
Introduction of the term "router" was (IMHO) nevertheless sufficient
for a sufficient terminology.
If someone wants to use todays strictest definition of "router",
then it would include only those features that are architecturally
happening up to layer 3 (IP/IPv6). Likewise, a clean "gateway"
would only involve any functions that on the gatewya at least
include a transport-level function.
This leaves out all the rich "hacks" we have introduced over
30 years into routers:
NAT ?! (still argued in IETF whether thats a "clean"
network layer function, but after 26 IPv4/IPv6
NAT mechanisms...)
DPI - Deep Packet inspection, starting from transport port
based inspection.
TCP fixups such as local rebuffering/retransmissions to overcome
window size issues
Accounting/Billing based on DPI (e.g.: IPFix, RTP perf-monitoring).
Security based on DPI (filtering/ACL, but also
more automated data models like MUD or captive portal
on router functions).
QoS/DiffServ based on DPI
"Performance Routing" based on DPI
All very useful for business, all very crappy architecturally,
no drive to change / clean-up any of this though. *sigh*
Cheers
Toerless
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 05:19:22AM +0000, Barbara Denny via Internet-history wrote:
> I think the change from router to gateway in the networking community was suggested somewhere in the 1983-1986 timeframe . I am using the final report for the Reconstitution Protocol project to jog my memory. I remember Jim Mathis telling me about this change in terminology because there was at least one other device, called a gateway, that provided a translation like functionality and people didn't want to create more confusion. I also don't think we would have used the word gateway during the RP project if router was the accepted term when we started. I am pretty sure we also were using the AGS Cisco boxes in the fall of 1986 for a different SRI project so I think the change in naming was underway by then. I don't remember feeling any surprise at Cisco's use of the word router to describe their product.
> It is interesting to remember that BGP as an experimental RFC wasn't released until 1989 so we still had the term gateway hanging around for quite a while afterwards. I don't mean to ignore IGRP and EIGRP either. Then there is also Lixia Zhang's paper on "How to Build a Gateway" dated April 1987.
> barbara
> On Tuesday, November 23, 2021, 10:39:31 AM PST, Jack Haverty via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear -- the incident I recalled about the sales people
> and "gateway" versus "router" was probably a few years later - early
> 80s. We always called them "gateways" until then. Jack
>
> On 11/22/21 1:34 PM, vinton cerf wrote:
> > your memory and mine are coincident - i had the impression that
> > "router" came from Cisco Systems but that had to be after 1984. If you
> > introduced the term "router" in 1977 that would certainly be early. I
> > stuck with "gateways" for quite a while after the 1977 three network
> > demonstration.
> >
> > v
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:50 PM Jack Haverty via Internet-history
> > <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> > <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Watching Jeopardy from November 17, 2021, I was surprised to see a
> > "clue" which was a picture of Len Kleinrock standing in front of the
> > ARPANET IMP which has been preserved at UCLA. It was a clue under
> > the
> > category "It's a New Machine".
> >
> > The host read the clue:
> >
> > "In 1969, Leonard Kleinrock and his team sent the first message
> > over the
> > Internet with the first THIS, which now connects devices like modems."
> >
> > None of the contestants knew the answer, although one guessed
> > "backbone", which isn't a bad guess. So the guest revealed the
> > answer:
> >
> > "You're looking at the first router."
> >
> > My immediate reaction was "No, you're not! That's an IMP."
> >
> > See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lmv1WKMGcDw
> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lmv1WKMGcDw> starting at about 1:29
> >
> > That's not quite like I remember it. Ginny Strazisar built the first
> > switching device for the Internet to connect the ARPANET to the
> > Packet
> > Radio net, circa 1977. To me that was the genesis of the
> > "Internet" -
> > INTERconnecting of NETworks of a variety of types, using TCP/IP to
> > glue
> > it all together. But millions of people just learned otherwise.
> >
> > A historical tidbit -- Back in 1977 Ginny's system was called a
> > "gateway", but later was renamed a "router". It's possible that
> > I did
> > the renaming. At BBN we were selling lots of packet switches, and
> > sometimes customers asked for ideas on how to use their LANs in the
> > network. Our sales people would tell them about the research
> > activities, and the role of gateways, TCP/IP , and the Internet.
> > But in
> > many customers' minds that term "gateway" immediately set off alarm
> > bells, because they had prior bad experience with "gateways" in their
> > IBM networks, and didn't want anything to do with more
> > "gateways". So
> > I suggested calling them "routers" instead of "gateways", and
> > suddenly
> > the marketplace became much more willing to listen.
> >
> > Enjoy,
> > Jack Haverty
> >
> >
> > --
> > Internet-history mailing list
> > Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> > <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
> > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> > <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history>
> >
>
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
--
---
tte at cs.fau.de
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list