[ih] Karl's post from Friday: Re: Interop as part of Internet History

[vinton cerf]

good question. the independent RFC stream is pretty open; historic is
usually with reference to a protocol so it would likely be considered a
re-interpretation of the intent of the term. Regardless of the label, I
don't see why a historical account could not be an independent stream
submission.
v


On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:10 AM dave walden via Internet-history <
internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:

> Can a historical RFC be an original document written today about ih
> history more generally than about earlier RFCs?  If so, that sounds good
> to me as long as the existence of the RFC series on the web is stable.
> If not, creating such a series with appropriate indexing and guidelines
> seems like a good idea to me.
>
> On 9/14/2020 4:31 AM, Vint Cerf wrote:
> > What about publishing as historical RFCS?
> >
> >
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>