[ih] Interop as part of Internet History (was Re: Fwd: Fwd: List archives (Was: Exterior Gateway Protocol))

Jack Haverty jack at 3kitty.org
Thu Sep 10 11:51:55 PDT 2020


I'll take a look, it easily could have been at SRI.  BTW, when I say
"meeting" it wasn't necessarily some formal session.  We had lots of
informal impromptu "meetings".   I vaguely remember that there was some
restaurant near SRI that was popular where people used to gather. 
Something to do with a train station; the tracks were right next to the
building.   Also a pancake/breakfast venue -- maybe "Ken's".

/Jack 

On 9/10/20 11:27 AM, Barbara Denny via Internet-history wrote:
>  Could that meeting have been at SRI? I have a memory of listening to a discussion regarding the creation of the IETF and the IRTF.  I could be wrong about this maybe being the meeting where it happened but I thought it might help you if you look through your notes. 
> barbara 
>     On Thursday, September 10, 2020, 11:11:55 AM PDT, Jack Haverty via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:  
>  
>  Hi Vint,
>
> I concur that the genesis of TCP was in 1973, and spawned a collection
> of separate projects, e.g., Packet Radio, Atlantic Satellite, etc. 
> which along with the ARPANET were forming the core of what we now call
> Internet.
>
> What I was remembering is that the moniker "Internet Project" didn't
> become permanent until the later 70s, with "internet" replacing the
> earlier term "catenet", as described in 1978 in:
>
> http://catenet.org/index.php/IEN_48_-_THE_CATENET_MODEL_FOR_INTERNETWORKING
>
> I recall some meeting, probably 1978/9, where there was a discussion of
> what to call our new conglomeration of networks.  The term "catenet" was
> proposed, but the general feeling was that it would cause people to
> envision herds of cats, and the term "internet" achieved the "rough
> consensus" stage as the best candidate for a name.  We already had
> running code!
>
> The ICCB/IAB was also a key element of history, especially as the
> creator of the IETF and IRTF.  Somewhere I have my notes of the ICCB (or
> was it IAB by then...?) meeting where that happened.
>
> Pandemics provide rare opportunities to dig through old boxes in the
> basement...
>
> /Jack
>
> On 9/10/20 2:55 AM, vinton cerf wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:22 AM Jack Haverty via Internet-history
>> <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>> <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     That "ACE Coaster" was handed out (by Dan, IIRC) at a small (dozen
>>     or so
>>     people) meeting that Dan called, I think to mostly bounce off ideas
>>     about a training/conference company.   Again IIRC this happened
>>     somewhat
>>     before the first actual conference in Monterey, where Dan subsequently
>>     stole the Internet using chocolate-chip cookies as bribes.   Vint
>>     never
>>     served such cookies!
>>
>> no, but I did offer champagne for winners of the TCP/IP Hackathons. 
>>
>>
>>     >From my retro-perspective, it was an interesting progression of
>>     events.  
>>
>>     The ARPA "Internet Project" had started in the late 70s with a
>>     somewhat
>>
>> no, it started in 1973. 
>>
>>     disjoint set of network-building projects, and had congealed into a
>>     network community, with quarterly meetings. 
>>
>>     At first, the "TCP Working Group" and the "Internet Working Group" met
>>     separately.  Quickly we noticed that the TCP group kept coming up with
>>     changes to the IP header, while the IP group saw things that needed to
>>     be in the TCP header, and everyone in one group wanted to
>>     participate in
>>     the other, so "layering" was cast aside and the Internet Project as a
>>     single group was born.
>>
>>     Over a year or two of such quarterly meetings, the size of the
>>     membership kept growing, and people had to plead with Vint for a
>>     "ticket" to attend.  
>>
>>     It had become difficult to find a willing host that had a venue big
>>     enough to handle the crowd for plenary and breakout sessions.   I
>>     hosted
>>     one at BBN, and learned that it is a very bad idea to host a large
>>     meeting in a newly renovated building with lots of free rooms and
>>     space,
>>     but without first testing to make sure the brand-new sparkling
>>     bathrooms
>>     actually worked.
>>
>>     The logistics of the quarterly meetings were becoming a serious
>>     problem.   Then Dan stepped in.
>>
>>     Instead of a meeting where ARPA and some benefactor host venue
>>     paid the
>>     costs and necessarily severely limited attendance, Dan rented (I
>>     assume
>>     it wasn't free!) a hotel, opened up a "ticket booth" to the masses,
>>
>> This is only half correct. Dan indeed opened Internet up to the public
>> but as I recall, the Internet research program continued in parallel.
>> The Internet Configuration Control Board (1979) morphed into the
>> Internet Advisory Board in 1984 with 10 Task Forces after Barry Leiner
>> took over
>> the  program management of the Internet Project at DARPA. In 1986, IAB 
>> become the Internet Activities Board under Dennis Perry's program
>> management
>> at DARPA. see https://www.iab.org/about/history/IAB and IETF and IRTF
>> continue as
>> does INTEROP after its sale by Dan Lynch to Masayoshi Son (when?)
>>
>>     charged attendees a fee that didn't raise too many bean-counters'
>>     alarms, and added a show floor for vendors too, for an appropriate fee
>>     of course.   He also recruited many of the people who used to just
>>     attend the quarterly Internet project meetings to provide the
>>     entertainment for all the attendees, and called it training and
>>     program
>>     presentations.
>>
>>     Not a bad solution to the problem, eh?  
>>
>>     I recall at first there was just a room with some tables and a handful
>>     of vendors showing their wares.  That turned pretty quickly into a
>>     trade
>>     show floor in Santa Clara, expanding into Moscone, and before long
>>     heading to Vegas when Moscone was just too small.
>>
>>     All of this had the overriding mandate that there would be a strong
>>     technical focus, a live network, and vendors had to connect their
>>     stuff
>>     to it.  For a few years, I was on the Interop "Program Committee",
>>     which
>>     met around a big table to decide which papers would be put into the
>>     program.  It was common to look at a paper, see who was the
>>     author, and
>>     if there was even a hint of "marketing" present, it quickly went
>>     to the
>>     reject pile.   Sometimes all it took was a look at the authors'
>>     titles.
>>
>>     I remember a meeting where Dan took a few of us to Moscone, to
>>     meet with
>>     the powers-that-be about possibly holding Interop there.  They were
>>     cordial, but IMHO clearly thought this event-they-never-heard-of
>>     didn't
>>     belong in Moscone.  A year later, after blowing out Santa Clara, they
>>     were much more receptive.  Doing the "MazeWar" throughout the Interop
>>     show floor was ... interesting.  I checked in to my hotel room on
>>     Sunday
>>     at noon, and didn't get back until Tuesday night.   After a few
>>     years in
>>     Moscone, it had become too small for Interop, so it was off to Vegas.
>>
>>     Fun times.  Interop was, IMHO, critical to getting the Internet
>>     out into
>>     the real world.  Nobody else showed products actually working, and
>>     that
>>     matters to the people who approve the POs.
>>
>>     But it's a good thing Dan didn't have more of the used-car-salesman
>>     genes.  Otherwise we would have all left Interop each year with a new
>>     vehicle.  Internet-ready, of course.
>>
>>     You were wrong, Dan. IMHO, you could have gotten more than 50%....
>>
>>     /Jack Haverty
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 9/8/20 2:48 PM, Dan Lynch via Internet-history wrote:
>>     > Craig, I think you did not copy the list.  And while I’m at it,
>>     a small edit.  I paid the tutors 15% , a full 50% more than the
>>     competition. I also charged everybody 50% more than the
>>     competition because I felt it was worth it!  I even charged the
>>     vendors 50% more than the competition. I turned out that I was right.
>>     >
>>     > Dan
>>     >
>>     > Cell 650-776-7313
>>     >
>>     > Begin forwarded message:
>>     >
>>     >> From: Craig Partridge <craig at tereschau.net
>>     <mailto:craig at tereschau.net>>
>>     >> Date: September 8, 2020 at 1:14:05 PM PDT
>>     >> To: Dan Lynch <dan at lynch.com <mailto:dan at lynch.com>>
>>     >> Cc: Craig Partridge via Internet-history
>>     <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>>
>>     >> Subject: Re:  [ih] Fwd: List archives (Was: Exterior Gateway
>>     Protocol)
>>     >>
>>     >> 
>>     >> Dan was kind enough to mention me, which makes it a little
>>     harder to send this note but I'll do it anyway.
>>     >>
>>     >> I think Dan underplays how radical Interop was.  Vendors had to
>>     connect their equipment to the show network.  There was a team of
>>     Internet wizards who helped setup the show network for each show. 
>>     (I recall stories of laying things out on netting in a warehouse
>>     so that it could easily be transferred to the show floor).  But it
>>     meant products actually worked.
>>     >>
>>     >> And then there was the education component, which as Dan tells,
>>     started things.  Dan took the view that he tried to hire the top
>>     instructors in the field and compensate them properly. At a time
>>     when competitors were paying 10% of the gross or $2K, whichever
>>     was less, Dan paid $2K or 10% of the gross, whichever was more. 
>>     That meant Interop's courses, instead of being taught by a grad
>>     student or a professor trying out a new course idea, were taught
>>     by folks like Doug Comer and Scott Bradner and Radia Perlman,
>>     teaching their areas of expertise.  As a result, the educational
>>     program was immense -- many thousands of students.  And because
>>     the instructors were already in town, Dan could recruit us to come
>>     do a panel session for the main program as well.  The panels were
>>     often also huge.  (I still remember a session I led that included
>>     Dave Clark and a couple of other key folks -- the room was packed
>>     -- probably 5,000 people -- and was so jammed that someone stepped
>>     on the tablecloth for the projector, dumping all our slides [this
>>     was pre-Powerpoint real-time projection] on the floor!  So I had
>>     to talk w/o slides while the other speakers ran to the back to
>>     reinsert their slides!).
>>     >>
>>     >> Attending Interop was a full week affair -- you got trained and
>>     then went to the showfloor and conference sessions, while grabbing
>>     a handful of the old Doubletree cookies (twice the size they are
>>     today) during the breaks.
>>     >>
>>     >> The transitions in size were wild.  We went from Monterrey, to
>>     the Santa Clara TechMart, to the San Jose Convention center to the
>>     Moscone Center in SF in rapid succession.
>>     >>
>>     >> Craig
>>     >>
>>     >>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 12:52 PM Dan Lynch via Internet-history
>>     <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
>>     >>> SoJack, you are asking me to recount how Interop came to be. I
>>     shall do that as quickly as I can here.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> In the early 80s I was at ISI in charge of the computer
>>     facility. After a year or so there came to be a term New Computing
>>     Environment to describe the advent of personal computers and the
>>     death of timesharing!  I think Keith Uncapher coined the term, tho
>>     maybe Bob Kahn and Vint Cerf had a hand in it. Anyway fast forward
>>     a few years and I was back in Silicon Valley looking to start a
>>     company like my pals at Stanford had been doing. I looked around
>>     and noticed that the Internet was gaining traction but the nascent
>>     companies had not quite got it right. So I convinced Barry Leiner
>>     who was a program manager there in 85/86 to let me convene a 3 day
>>     workshop on TCP/IP protocols to explain them to the hundred or so
>>     implementation teams out there. I got the actual protocol
>>     designers to come to Monterrey California for 3 days. There was no
>>     company name then. I had no idea where this was going then.
>>     Needless to say the event was a success. The researchers learned
>>     of real life problems the early vendors we’re experiencing and the
>>     vendors learned a lot more about the Internet and what worked and
>>     what still needed further steps.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> I now had a business of teaching (through others) the vendors
>>     and advanced customers how the Internet works. I needed a name. I
>>     took the old name above and called it Advanced Computing Environment.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> A few years in to this the world really wanted to see working
>>     systems and I decided to try a trade show, with one critical
>>     addition: the systems had to be connected to an actual working
>>     Internet!  And while I was on the phone with one of my brilliant
>>     tutor people from BBN, Craig Partridge, as were were concluding
>>     the call he blurted out “I’ll see you at Interop “. I hung up the
>>     phone and called my lawyer to register the name immediately!  I
>>     had been calling it The TCP/IP Interoperability Conference and
>>     Exhibition!  Ah, simplicity.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> That was in September of 1988. It had 50 vendors and 5000
>>     attendees. In 1990 it had grown to 200 vendors and 30,000
>>     attendees. Clearly this Internet stuff was catching on, eh? 
>>     >>>
>>     >>> So I sold the company and stayed on for 5 more years as the PR
>>     guy and growing it into Europe and Asia.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> 30 years later it still exists in about 10 locations I. The
>>     world. Not quite the same, but still stressing interoperability.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> Thanks for asking, Jack.
>>     >>>
>>     >>>
>>     >>>
>>     >>> Dan
>>     >>>
>>     >>> Cell 650-776-7313
>>     >>>
>>     >>>> On Sep 5, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Jack Haverty via Internet-history
>>     <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> Thanks Dan!
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> There's so much of the history that didn't get recorded in
>>     RFCs and
>>     >>>> such, and mail list archives from that era are rare.  We
>>     weren't very
>>     >>>> good about documenting things, especially the "why" of how
>>     decisions
>>     >>>> were made.
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> There's plenty of room for more participation!   Perhaps you
>>     can provide
>>     >>>> the story behind this artifact of the early Internet?
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> ACE Coaster
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> That coaster has been sitting on my desk for close to 40
>>     years.  The
>>     >>>> lettering is fading, after too many attacks by marauding
>>     coffee mugs
>>     >>>> over the decades, and a few trips to the floor courtesy of a
>>     roaming cat.
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> The story of ACE, and Interop which followed, is an important
>>     part of
>>     >>>> Internet history.  There tends to be a focus on protocols and
>>     >>>> algorithms, but innovations like Interop were, IMHO, equally
>>     important
>>     >>>> to the success of the Internet by making it accessible to the
>>     masses and
>>     >>>> emphasizing the importance of working systems.
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> Perhaps more important.   Tell us the story.
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> /Jack
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>>> On 9/5/20 12:10 PM, Dan Lynch via Internet-history wrote:
>>     >>>>> Forgot to copy the fantastic list!
>>     >>>>>
>>     >>>>> Dan
>>     >>>>>
>>     >>>>> Cell 650-776-7313
>>     >>>>>
>>     >>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>     >>>>>
>>     >>>>>> From: Dan Lynch <dan at lynch.com <mailto:dan at lynch.com>>
>>     >>>>>> Date: September 5, 2020 at 11:42:36 AM PDT
>>     >>>>>> To: Joseph Touch <touch at strayalpha.com
>>     <mailto:touch at strayalpha.com>>
>>     >>>>>> Subject: Re:  [ih] List archives (Was: Exterior Gateway
>>     Protocol)
>>     >>>>>>
>>     >>>>>> Great!  These discussions are amazing, considering that
>>     they are being done by the actual inventors of much of the
>>     Internet some 3 or 4 decades later. We were young then, eh?  Of
>>     course they must be open to the world. Thank you Noel, Miles,
>>     Brian, Tony, Vint, Jack, and others I’ve forgotten just now.
>>     >>>>>>
>>     >>>>>> Dan
>>     >>>>>>
>>     >>>>>> Cell 650-776-7313
>>     >>>>>>
>>     >>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2020, at 8:06 AM, Joseph Touch via
>>     Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
>>     >>>>>>>
>>     >>>>>>> HI, all,
>>     >>>>>>>
>>     >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2020, at 7:58 AM, Noel Chiappa via
>>     Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:internet-history at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
>>     >>>>>>>>>>
>>     >>>>>>>>>> From: Joseph Touch
>>     >>>>>>>>> FYI - we moved the archives here.
>>     >>>>>>>> I've just noticed that the archives are now only
>>     accessible to list members?
>>     >>>>>>> They should have been open. If anything changed recently,
>>     this is the first I heard. Either way, the setting has been
>>     updated to allow public access.
>>     >>>>>>>
>>     >>>>>>> Please let me know if you continue to find otherwise.
>>     >>>>>>>
>>     >>>>>>> Joe (as list admin)
>>     >>>>>>> --
>>     >>>>>>> Internet-history mailing list
>>     >>>>>>> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
>>     >>>>>>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>>     >>>> --
>>     >>>> Internet-history mailing list
>>     >>>> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
>>     >>>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>>     >>> --
>>     >>> Internet-history mailing list
>>     >>> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
>>     >>> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>>     >>
>>     >> --
>>     >> *****
>>     >> Craig Partridge's email account for professional society
>>     activities and mailing lists.
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Internet-history mailing list
>>     Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
>>     <mailto:Internet-history at elists.isoc.org>
>>     https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>>




More information about the Internet-history mailing list