[ih] UDP Length Field?
Timothy J. Salo
salo at saloits.com
Sat Nov 28 15:42:45 PST 2020
Hi,
Can anyone provide some [historical] insight into why the UDP header
contains a length field? TCP manages to ascertain the length of data in
a packet just fine without a length field, so why couldn't UDP?
Several people have noted that the UDP length field is redundant,
including for example, the current Internet Draft "Transport Options for
UDP",
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-09.txt>.
There are some other opinions, some of which sound to me like
after-the-fact reasoning:
- So that UDP can run over network protocols other than IP (although
presumably TCP could do this just fine without a length field). But,
the UDP spec says that an IP-like pseudo header needs to be created,
in any case.
- Layering and encapsulation reasons, (although, again, TCP seems like
a counter example).
- Word alignment, (there were 16-bits left over, so why not use it for
the length?). Personally, this sounds the most likely to me.
Thanks,
-tjs
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list