[ih] how big was the host file
Barbara Denny
b_a_denny at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 6 12:34:28 PST 2020
Very close, the box was called a port expander. A gateway to another network could be behind the port expander. You can find the SRI technical report for the port expander on the net.
I must admit when I was testing I don't think I bothered to update the NIC all the time. I knew the IP addressable devices on packet radio and I could just add entries to my local host file if I felt the need.
barbara
On Thursday, February 6, 2020, 04:16:02 AM PST, vinton cerf via Internet-history <internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
there was provision for up to 4 hosts per IMP and we even had a "port
extender" for IP addresses as TCP/IP rolled out. So I don't think 64 was
the limit.
v
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:10 AM John Day via Internet-history <
internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> Why was it so large?
>
> There certainly weren’t 134 hosts on the ’Net in 1973. Wasn’t the maximum
> number then still 64?
>
> John
>
> > On Feb 6, 2020, at 03:28, Lars Brinkhoff via Internet-history <
> internet-history at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> >
> > Jacques Latour wrote:
> >> How big was the host file before the DNS came in action? 200K entries?
> >
> > I'd like to go in the other direction. What are the smallest recorded
> > hosts files?
> >
> > An MIT hosts file from 1973 was 134 lines.
> > --
> > Internet-history mailing list
> > Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> > https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>
> --
> Internet-history mailing list
> Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
> https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
>
--
Internet-history mailing list
Internet-history at elists.isoc.org
https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list