[ih] UDP Length Field?

Jack Haverty jack at 3kitty.org
Thu Dec 3 12:36:44 PST 2020


Thanks, Steve, I vaguely remember that there were some highly restricted
experiments reluctantly authorized, but not anything widespread.   E.g.,
an obvious experiment would have been to use uncontrolled mode for all
the core gateways and other gateways attached to ARPANET, but AFAIK that
was never authorized.

Also, I don't remember ever knowing in detail exactly how "uncontrolled"
packets were actually handled by the IMP code, or what was experienced
in any experiments that were done.   E.g., did uncontrolled packets "go
to the front of the queue" bypassing normal traffic?  Did they interfere
with other traffic, e.g., by preempting buffer space, or just get
discarded when resources were unavailable?  In experiments, what were
latencies, drop rates, et al like for UDP datagrams?   How did the
ARPANET behave during such experiments?   Etc.

/Jack

On 12/2/20 4:33 PM, Stephen Casner wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, Jack Haverty via Internet-history wrote:
>
>> There was an "uncontrolled mode" of operation possible within the
>> ARPANET, which wouldallow a user computer to send packets bypassing all
>> of the reliability mechanisms.   That could be used to deliver datagram
>> Internet service.   However, the ARPANET managers (at DCA and BBN) were
>> extremely reluctant to permit hosts (e.g., gateways) to use that mode,
>> for fear that the uncontrolled traffic would crash the ARPANET.   I
>> recall being involved in several "discussions" about using ARPANET
>> uncontrolled mode for Internet experiments, but I don't remember any
>> permissions ever being granted.
> We definitely did get permission to use this for packet voice
> experiments between ISI and LL, for example.  What I recall is that
> initially we were required to arrange with BBN for a specific
> experiment time between specific hosts and the uncontrolled mode (Type
> 0, Subtype 3 -- BBN 1822 p. 3-17) would be enabled only for those
> hosts.  But later I believe our packet voice hosts were enabled all
> the time.
>
>                                                         -- Steve




More information about the Internet-history mailing list