[ih] When did "32" bits for IP register as "not enough"?
Grant Taylor
internet-history at gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net
Wed Feb 13 21:19:25 PST 2019
On 2/13/19 10:01 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> IPX/SPX bridging equipment was sold to businesses and enterprises. No
> ISP-like intermediaries existed because there was no security boundry
> enforcable, so it was not a good means to interconnect multiple
> enterprises.
I thought that Border Manager had the ability to filter IPX traffic.
I've not done much with it myself, so I'm not certain of that.
> However, individual frame relay connections for these were common and I
> guess dealing with the Bell monopoly in those days was somewhat similar
> to dealing with the cable monopoly today.
ACK
> I do not recall how well these bridges worked. They were better than
> nothing.
I thought they did classic MAC address learning.
> I'm trying to remember the date of my first novell smtp email gw...
GroupWise Internet Agent, a.k.a. GWIA. It was the bane of our GroupWise
admin's existence for a while at an old job.
I think I may have first set one up in training in early 2000. I have
since done it for @^*%s and giggles in VM in the last few years.
> Side note - when I first got ahold of my first pre-wifi cards in 1998,
> they were only usable as an IPX/SPX bridge. We got tcp/ip running on
> 'em in about the middle of that year.
I did something similar. I think I was booting the box that was the
bridge off of a Fibre Channel SAN using HBAs that supposedly didn't
support boot from SAN. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> http://the-edge.blogspot.com/2010/10/who-invented-embedded-linux-based.html
*nod*
I think the person that patented the claw hammer did so after realizing
that someone else had not patented it, so s/he did.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list