[ih] Arpanet line speed

[dave.walden.family at gmail.com]

Right, Bob Kahn would know details as he dealt with ATT and specified the 24-bit CRC.  Ben Barker would also know, but he may not be on this list.  The following may be helpful:  
  http://walden-family.com/impcode/imp-hardware.pdf
pages 4-1 to 4-5. (BBN designed the IMP/MODEM interface,, Honeywell implemented it using their board technology, Ben and Severo Ornstein debugged the Honeywell implementation, and then had a test program, I believe, to check later machine deliveries for correct implementation as they arrived.)

On Jan 18, 2017, at 4:10 AM, Paul Ruizendaal <pnr at planet.nl> wrote:

> 
> I'm wondering about (early) Arpanet line speed. Online sources seem to say that it was 50kb/s on the long haul connections, provided by AT&T. To me, that "50" sounds like a strange number:
> 
> - if the modem from the IMP to the Bell System was analog, the best technology of the time was perhaps 2.4kb/s (and this speed seems to have been considered initially). In this case a speed of 50kb/s is not a multiple of 2.4kb/s, and it would have required 21 parallel lines -- more logical would have been to use a full T1 connection and have 24 parallel lines or 57.6kb/s.
> 
> - if the modem from the IMP to the Bell System was digital, it would most likely have used a single channel of a T1 connection, i.e. a 56kb/s rate. I suppose AT&T would have to run special lines from the IMP to the trunk, as I don't think digital lines were used for the last mile back then (perhaps they were to company/hotel PBX's, I don't know).
> 
> Perhaps the "50" is a rounded number, perhaps some capacity is used for error correction, perhaps it is plain wrong.
> 
> Does anybody have more background information on this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______
> internet-history mailing list
> internet-history at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> Contact list-owner at postel.org for assistance.