[ih] bytes [Re: "network unix"]
John Day
jeanjour at comcast.net
Tue Oct 11 07:18:57 PDT 2016
The thing I remember about this (not much) ;-) is that they didn't understand that auto-increment, auto-decrement addressing modes should be on opposite sides of the instruction so they can be used for stack operations. I figured it was an indicator.
> On Oct 11, 2016, at 09:44, Scott Bradner <sob at sobco.com> wrote:
>
> this is the story I remember at the time -almost all of the DG founders were all ex-DEC people
> particularly Ed de Castro who ran the PDP-8 stuff for DEC - the Nova was basically a glorified PDP-8
>
> Scott
>
>> On Oct 10, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "John Levine" <johnl at iecc.com>
>>
>>> There was a competing 16 bit word addressed design by the designer of
>>> the PDP-8, which after DEC rejected it became the DG Nova.
>>
>
>
> _______
> internet-history mailing list
> internet-history at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/internet-history
> Contact list-owner at postel.org for assistance.
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list