[ih] ARPANET and Apollo 11
jeanjour at comcast.net
Thu Mar 12 17:07:07 PDT 2015
Yet another example of mission creep turning into a monster. Remember all those Walt Disney and 2001 models of a space station and as the jumping off point for the moon?
The ISS can’t be expanded in such a way to do artificial gravity, and is not in the right place to use as a jump off for the moon, and it can’t be moved.
It is an amazing feat, but it doesn’t lay the ground work for the next step.
> On Mar 12, 2015, at 18:36, John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>> in the aftermath of Sputnik 1. Then they needed one cycle of intense
>> systems development, and neither of them suffered from second-system
>> syndrome, ...
> Hmmn. So we should now compare the Space Shuttle to the Internet.
> For all the glamor of the Apollo program, it was a dead end, sort of
> like building the Pyramids. We learned that by exerting the kind of
> effort only a motivated government can bring to a project, we could
> send a dozen guys to the moon for a few days each.
> The Atlantic Monthly had an interesting article last month on the
> International Space Station:
> It's clear we're still in Pyramids mode. The highly trained staff
> still spend the majority of their time on what might be called not
> dying, maintenance of the equipment and dealing with the effects of
> weightlessness on their bodies. (For example, everyone gets
> farsighted, and unlike the bone loss, it doesn't reverse when they get
> back.) Each person in space is supported by dozens of people on the
> ground, and everything they do is planned and scripted from Houston or
> its Russian equivalent. The ISS has room to do zero gee
> manufacturing, but so far there hasn't been anything to make it
> worthwhile. Private companies like SpaceX are likely to bring down
> the cost of sending stuff into space from incredibly high to merely
> very very expensive, but I don't see any sort of private space travel
> beyond $100,000 tourist jaunts and perhaps Elon Musk's private trip to
> Mars, where he says he wants to die, preferably not on impact, on
> which he could spend a billion dollars.
> The Internet, on the other hand, turned out to scale magnificently, to
> the point where stuff is so routine and so cheap that we take it for
> granted that our 13 year old kids have $30 networked supercomputers in
> their pockets and we argue about what they should be allowed to do
> with them.
> internet-history mailing list
> internet-history at postel.org
> Contact list-owner at postel.org for assistance.
More information about the Internet-history