[ih] Why was hop by hop flow control eventually abandonded?
John Kristoff
jtk at depaul.edu
Tue Jul 16 10:35:45 PDT 2013
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:55:00PM +0200, Detlef Bosau wrote:
> The more I think about it, the more I fear, that although the decision
> to abandon hop by hop flow control
[...]
That was well before my time, but arguably versions of independent
per-hop control has been attempted, if not widely implemented since
then. Isn't a great deal of the CoS (aka, QoS) work, usually done with
those magic few bits in the IP header, later finalized as DiffServ, a
descadent form?
In addition, much of the work on router queue management, usually done
on a packet independent basis such as rudimentary implementations of
RED do this as well, augmented with ECN signallying.
Further, isn't much of the renewed interest in so-called "buffer
bloat" a related area of work.
It should seem like a small miracle, if not a bit scary, that the end
host based flow and congestion control we have works as well as it does
in this hugely autonomous system of networks and hosts.
John
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list