[ih] Hesitating to disagree with one of the father s of the Internet..
John Day
jeanjour at comcast.net
Thu May 10 15:49:28 PDT 2012
CCA who was doing the datacomputer.
Roland Bryan had his company ACC, although for this early early
period that doesn't count.
At 18:02 -0400 2012/05/10, Dave Walden wrote:
>>As I recall, BBN was the only (principal?) corporation involved in
>>the NWG. Others were government and academia and a few non-profits.
>
>As I said in my message a few minutes ago, BBN was probably the
>largest group and we were a non-government and non-academic
>corporation. However Network Analysis Corporation which did the
>topological design was also was such a corporation, and ATT Long
>Lines was certainly such a corporation (they didn't help with the
>design; thus just supplied the lines under contract to the
>government). Also, some of the early host sites might have
>subcontracted their IMP interface implementation to a small private
>company, e.g., maybe at UCSB. Also, while BBN was nominally
>for-profit and SRI was nominally non-profit, I don't think there was
>much practical different between how the two of them operated and
>interacted with the government. Neither was a government or
>academic organization; both were (are) contract R&D places.
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list