[ih] Re: Global congestion collapse
Michael Welzl
michael.welzl at uibk.ac.at
Sun Dec 26 12:17:34 PST 2004
Dear all,
Some of you mentioned a TCP patch by Jacobson in this thread - e.g.:
> Craig Partridge wrote:
> ...
> >>Either way, though, it was pretty shortly thereafter that I remember
> >>getting my first replacement .o files with yummy new TCP congestion
> >>control algorithms in them.
I'm interested in the history of Internet congestion control; so,
I wonder:
* were admins aware that this patch would reduce your own rate and
might make things worse for you if you're the only one who installs it?
e.g., think of 1000 * unresponsive UDP vs. 1 * TCP - across a single
bottleneck - in this scenario, a single unresponsive flow would be
better off than a single TCP flow.
* Van Jacobson's paper came out in August 1988. I think that the first
RFC which says "you MUST implement congestion control" is
RFC 1122 - which came out October 1989. What happened in between?
Was it just a patch flying around and word of mouth ("c'mon, install it,
we'll all be better off")?
It all looks a bit like an Internet community type of thing to me that
couldn't work like this nowadays. Am I right?
Cheers,
Michael
More information about the Internet-history
mailing list