[Chapter-delegates] Chapter advice on live streaming

IBRAHIM MOUSSA terap91 at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 12:18:01 PST 2025 

Je suis vraiment désolé que Joly ait traversé tout cela. Il mérite mieux.
J’espère que la situation se résoudra très rapidement.
Merci.
Cordialement.

Le mer. 5 févr. 2025, 18:17, Winthrop Yu via Chapter-delegates <
chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> a écrit :

> This has been on my mind, and I had been hoping for at least a gesture of
> good faith. Instead, adding insult to injury, Joly has yet again been
> shabbily treated. Like Cheryl, I am deeply disappointed, but like her and
> many others I am sure we appreciate and remember the exceptional work that
> Joly has done and continues to do, even as others seem to be taking credit
> for Joly's work.
>
> As ISOC HQ Board elections near, I would recommend a careful re-reading of
> the posts that Charles and Eduardo made back in September 2024, these can
> be found towards the bottom of this thread.
>
> WYn
> Philippines
>
> On 2/4/2025 6:57 AM, Joly MacFie via Chapter-delegates wrote:
>
> Hi Charles,
>
> AFAIK the way that YouTube works that the 13 days ago was the day they
> were made 'public', they may have been uploaded and 'unlisted' before that.
>
> The more reliable date is that the channel 'joined' on Aug 14, 2024.
>
> Now, ISOC-NY's BTN rejection letter was dated July 16 2024. I
> remember being surprised because, at BoT 181 on June 22, I was pretty sure
> I had heard Andrew Sullivan deflect a question from Cheryl on this, by
> saying funding had just been approved for the archiving.
>
> I assumed this meant our grant application.Wiser now.
>
> Joly
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 5:02 PM Charles Mok (gmail) <charlespmok at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Joly, you are right that most or all of us are unaware of the new
>> channel. Looking at it, it seems that all the videos in there were uploaded
>> en masse 13 days ago. I wonder if I missed any public announcements
>> about it over the last two weeks? Or maybe an announcement about it will be
>> coming? In any case, we will have some questions to ask.
>>
>> Charles
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 1:56 PM Joly MacFie via Chapter-delegates <
>> chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Chreyl,
>>>
>>> The silver lining is of course that the material *IS* available, if not
>>> in proper archive form, and chapters can go ahead and find their stuff on
>>> that channel and upgrade legacy links, embeds etc.appropriately
>>>
>>> Joly
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 4:50 PM Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jolly, I am very disappointed with how all this is being "managed" I
>>>> must say, Thank YOU for YOUR extraordinary service to us in
>>>> volunteer/Chapter land for so many years in this actually quite demanding
>>>> area. and **HUGE SIGH**
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>>>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>>>> about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
>>>> <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 08:04, Joly MacFie via Chapter-delegates <
>>>> chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your support!
>>>>>
>>>>> ISOC Zambia does great work.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 3:43 PM levy syanseke <lsyanseke at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a hard read.
>>>>>> Thanks Joly, for your hard work and commitment to the Internet
>>>>>> Society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do hope recognition of your work goes beyond word to probably being
>>>>>> rewarded, especially following the new channel with most of your work and
>>>>>> you havent been consulted or engaged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wish you well. I do remember our first work when the chapter was
>>>>>> launched, your work is indeed great.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wish you well once again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Levy Syanseke
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Media Studies Tutor | Ramah Designs
>>>>>> <https://web.facebook.com/ramahdesigns/> - Founder
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Internet Society Zambia Chapter <https://isoczambia.org> - Founding
>>>>>> president
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Youth IGF Movement <https://youthigf.com/>- Community Coordinator
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +260 978 210 494 <+260+978+210+494>
>>>>>> lsyanseke at gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://ramahdesigns.business.site/>
>>>>>>  God Loves You!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 9:11 PM Joly MacFie via Chapter-delegates <
>>>>>> chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a further update on this issue i.e. the preservation of the
>>>>>>> Livestream.com archive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you may recall ISOC Foundation rejected ISOC-NY's small grant
>>>>>>> request for $1200 expenses on the basis "*the total number of
>>>>>>> requests we receive exceed the amount of funding we have available and we
>>>>>>> must select projects most closely aligned to the goals of our Foundation*
>>>>>>> ."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Faced with the prospect of 1000+ ISOC events disappearing into the
>>>>>>> ether, in the last weeks of November I dug into my personal savings, and
>>>>>>> went ahead on my own. It turned out that a) scraping was a little more
>>>>>>> complicated than I had thought, and b) there was mode data than I had
>>>>>>> imagined  so that I ended up needing 3 drives. The total expenses were $
>>>>>>> 1670.94
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The scraping process took a over two weeks. ISOC's 3 accounts were
>>>>>>> due to expire in the second week of December, and it was a race against
>>>>>>> time to bring in all the data.  As it turned out, only Channel 3 was
>>>>>>> immediately deleted. Fortunately we just got it all in time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Meanwhile the Internet Archive itself was having issues. It had been
>>>>>>> hacked and access was severely limited. They had their hands full.  The
>>>>>>> task remained (and remains) to reshape the raw JSON metadata into something
>>>>>>> that their system can ingest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But at least everything was safe. The idea was proposed, and
>>>>>>> informally discussed, with Chris Locke, that ISOC Foundation could be
>>>>>>> approached to cover my outlay and the further processing cost.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that was where it stood, until this week, when to my total
>>>>>>> surprise, it was revealed that ISOC had opened it's own YouTube Channel '*Internet
>>>>>>> Society On-Deman*d
>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/@InternetSocietyOnDemand>' in August, and
>>>>>>> by some method, either scraping or via Vimeo, itself collected and posted
>>>>>>> 5.1k videos from Livestream! It posits itself : " Watch past
>>>>>>> Internet Society streamed and recorded events and videos all in one place.
>>>>>>> " Written by someone with a sense of humour, obviously!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Every single one of these videos is my work.Was I consulted/informed
>>>>>>> at any point? No. Were even other ISOC people who might have told me
>>>>>>> informed? Were Chapter  Leaders informed? No. Were Chapter Trustees
>>>>>>> informed? No. No.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was someone else paid a good deal of money to do this? Probably.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How I discovered this at all is because when, earlier in the week,
>>>>>>> the Cybersecurity SIG had requested funding to have me livestream a
>>>>>>> forthcoming event, they were told, we have our own channel now, why do you
>>>>>>> need Joly at all?l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If a SIG or chapter wants to record their event via Zoom, they can
>>>>>>>> send it to us and we will post it on our Internet Society on Demand YouTube
>>>>>>>> page, https://www.youtube.com/@InternetSocietyOnDemand
>>>>>>>> If you require live streaming  (not sure how this differs
>>>>>>>> from leveraging your current Zoom account and inviting members to join.),
>>>>>>>> please provide a document with rationale, benefit, and associated costs for
>>>>>>>> Joly's services and we can apply through the external contractor process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, as Chapters/SIGS I work with know there are several things ISOC
>>>>>>> LIVE does beyond just reposting Zooms, e.g. co-promoting their events,
>>>>>>> recompositing the streams live, simulcasting (including to regional FB
>>>>>>> pages before they removed my access) , editing the recordings, making and
>>>>>>> correcting transcripts etc etc.  It shou;d be easy enough to ,ale a quick
>>>>>>> Statement of Work for that stuff. We'll see the response.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But SIGs are a special case,.Unlike Chapters that are chartered
>>>>>>> entities, SIGS are internal projects and funded internally. I suspect that
>>>>>>> any Chapter looking for similar funding will be referred to the BTN Small
>>>>>>> Grants process (wherever it reappears) with its 8 week run up etc.  As I
>>>>>>> have said before, this is basically a non-starter, since in all my days
>>>>>>> I've rarely if ever had more than a few days notice of a Chapter
>>>>>>> livestream. Nevertheless, a draft Statement of Work will be created that
>>>>>>> Chapters can use for this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the bigger picture the way this has been done is just another
>>>>>>> example of ISOC Staff imposing top-down solutions, but, in this case,
>>>>>>> underhandedly, in the face of vociferous advocacy from the community.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My feeling on this is that Chapters should act collectively to take
>>>>>>> control of their media output, say a Chapters Media Council or similar,
>>>>>>> that, given ISOC's failings in this area, both in vision and practice,
>>>>>>> could take over ISOC LIVE, and contract me, or someone else, to keep up the
>>>>>>> work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This I suspect would also satisfy ISOC Comms, who plainly want to
>>>>>>> maintain a clear distinction between Chapters output and that of ISOC
>>>>>>> itself, in order to focus their messaging. They have never promoted the
>>>>>>> livestreaming (with the notable exception of the PIR fiasco).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joly
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 1:50 PM Caleb Ogundele via Chapter-delegates
>>>>>>> <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Speaking in my personal capacity.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Many thanks, Charles you for sharing your thoughts, which resonate
>>>>>>>> with some of my own reflections. I have been following this conversation
>>>>>>>> closely, and while I may have a different perspective on certain comments
>>>>>>>> made by a few other persons  in this thread, I want to emphasize that ISOC
>>>>>>>> is community-driven and community-powered. Engaging in discussions like
>>>>>>>> this makes us better, as we can all learn from one another and work towards
>>>>>>>> earning each other’s trust.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the record, I support open engagement that enhances our
>>>>>>>> Chapter, even though my fiduciary duty at this point is to ISOC.org, which
>>>>>>>> limits the extent of my engagement as a member of ISOC's Board of Trustees.
>>>>>>>> However, I will always advocate that community comes first, and ISOC is no
>>>>>>>> exception in the multistakeholder approach we have all championed. As an
>>>>>>>> African proverb states, “It takes a whole village to raise a child.” For
>>>>>>>> ISOC to become what we all envision in that child I see in that proverb, it
>>>>>>>> must always be driven by engagement within our community.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I want to express my gratitude to all the community members who
>>>>>>>> have relentlessly engaged on this topic. I believe that the concerned
>>>>>>>> individuals in this thread are listening, and listening is a key component
>>>>>>>> of accountability. I am optimistic that taking the right steps to earn the
>>>>>>>> community's trust and needs is important and I hope this issue will soon be
>>>>>>>> resolved.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> *Caleb Ogundele*
>>>>>>>> Chapter Elected,
>>>>>>>> ISOC Board of Trustees Member
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 3:07 AM Charles Mok (gmail) via
>>>>>>>> Chapter-delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Eduardo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Eduardo you are right that chapters and our members form an
>>>>>>>>> important part of who ISOC is. In "About Us" on our website, you see we
>>>>>>>>> prominently mentioned "128,265" Members, "131" chapters and SIGs, and 84
>>>>>>>>> OMs. This is by no means to compare which is/are more important, but it is
>>>>>>>>> also fair to say that without chapters, we will become more like a trade or
>>>>>>>>> industry consortium, which is clearly not what ISOC wants to be seen as.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I also want to go back to the points that Barry talked about.
>>>>>>>>> (Following Barry's lead, I also say here for the record that I am a trustee
>>>>>>>>> elected by chapters.)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The point that Barry (and Luis) reiterated that "once any of us
>>>>>>>>> becomes a trustee we are not representing the community that put
>>>>>>>>> us here: we are representing the Internet Society itself and
>>>>>>>>> acting in the interest of the Society as a whole" is true. But,
>>>>>>>>> to me, this is more about how the communities (including chapters, their
>>>>>>>>> leaders and members) should perceive the trustees, more than binding what
>>>>>>>>> they trustees should "care about." It is true that it is common that
>>>>>>>>> chapters may have the "wrong perception" that their elected trustees
>>>>>>>>> "represent" them, or possibly also the same perception exists for some in
>>>>>>>>> the OM or IETF communities too. But that has more to do with
>>>>>>>>> the constituents' perception and hence expectation, more than what it
>>>>>>>>> should limit what the trustees can or should do. In fact, it shouldn't. As
>>>>>>>>> a trustee, I believe we can still advocate for chapters, oir OMs, or IETF,
>>>>>>>>> or anyone else. The fortunate part of it is that there shouldn't be a "zero
>>>>>>>>> sum" scenario among ISOC constituents and the Internet communities as a
>>>>>>>>> whole. After all, in virtually all situations, I strongly believe what is
>>>>>>>>> good for the chapters as a whole should be good for the other communities,
>>>>>>>>> and vice versa. Even what's good for the OM community "as a whole" (not
>>>>>>>>> individual company members) should be good for chapters and the whole
>>>>>>>>> Internet community too. So why not? Even when we talk about this case about
>>>>>>>>> live streaming, those in the OM or IETF communities can listen to and
>>>>>>>>> benefit from it, and I am sure some do too, right? So, I choose to advocate
>>>>>>>>> for any or all of them as appropriate for the matter, rather than avoiding
>>>>>>>>> any one (or all) of them, including the constituent that just happens to
>>>>>>>>> have elected me to the board.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And about the point that the board should not interfere with
>>>>>>>>> management actions, I agree too that is proper. The board should not
>>>>>>>>> micromanage the executive management. But that does not mean that the board
>>>>>>>>> must collectively agree with or defend any (past or present) management
>>>>>>>>> decision either. Otherwise, it may be the management micromanaging the
>>>>>>>>> minds of individual board trustees :) That would not be a nice thing :)  Of
>>>>>>>>> course, due to confidentiality, trustees (and management too) should not
>>>>>>>>> discuss the details of the proceedings in the board. But, that should not
>>>>>>>>> be necessarily construed as that the board collectively agrees completely
>>>>>>>>> and without any reservation with any or management decisions, the kind of
>>>>>>>>> thing that we just said the board cannot interfere with in the first place.
>>>>>>>>> So, there may be some management decisions that some trustees may choose
>>>>>>>>> not to defend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As Barry well said, "management has to have the freedom and
>>>>>>>>> flexibility to handle day-to-day operations as it sees appropriate, within
>>>>>>>>> the strategic plan that we worked with them to
>>>>>>>>> create." It should and can also have the freedom and flexibility
>>>>>>>>> to change course and make revisions to policies or executive decisions
>>>>>>>>> based on new information, feedback received from the communities, and
>>>>>>>>> plainly learning to fix something that did not work very well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There have been a lot of useful discussions here. It is
>>>>>>>>> unfortunate that the past decision has got us to this point. For that, as
>>>>>>>>> they say, it is what it is, or, it was what it was. Looking to the future,
>>>>>>>>> I think we can move on, and it seems pretty clear that there are ways
>>>>>>>>> (including some discussed in the thread here) that can lead to a better
>>>>>>>>> outcome.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Charles
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 2:45 PM Eduardo Diaz via Chapter-delegates
>>>>>>>>> <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Barry,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I appreciate your insights regarding the responsibilities of the
>>>>>>>>>> Board of Trustees for the entire Internet Society. However, it is crucial
>>>>>>>>>> to recognize that most of the Internet Society's composition consists of
>>>>>>>>>> its chapters. The ISOC chapters serve as the organization's foundation;
>>>>>>>>>> without them, ISOC would face considerable challenges in effectively
>>>>>>>>>> communicating its message. With approximately 128,000 members, the chapters
>>>>>>>>>> are essential in mobilizing and engaging the broader community. When
>>>>>>>>>> individuals join a chapter, they become ISOC global members before
>>>>>>>>>> selecting their preferred chapter, emphasizing the chapters' importance in
>>>>>>>>>> representing the entire ISOC community.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Chapter Advisory Council (ChAC) was established in the ISOC
>>>>>>>>>> bylaws to ensure a unified voice for all chapters, allowing them to present
>>>>>>>>>> issues pertinent to their members. Consequently, when the Board receives
>>>>>>>>>> formal advice from the ChAC, it should be regarded as a collective
>>>>>>>>>> perspective from its chapters. Given that the Board does not engage in
>>>>>>>>>> operational matters, it would have been prudent to thoroughly review the
>>>>>>>>>> ISOC strategic documents to identify areas where the functionality
>>>>>>>>>> explicitly requested by the chapters could be integrated into the strategy
>>>>>>>>>> and then request the ISOC CEO to implement it. I believe this consideration
>>>>>>>>>> needed to be adequately addressed by all the trustees, particularly given
>>>>>>>>>> the informal way it was discussed. The Board's request to present this
>>>>>>>>>> issue to the staff has been interpreted as a lack of concern for the
>>>>>>>>>> chapters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So, I would like to ask whether the trustees are willing to
>>>>>>>>>> consider a bylaw change that would allow the ChAC to send formal advice to
>>>>>>>>>> the ISOC CEO regarding matters deemed operational. Absent such a change,
>>>>>>>>>> staff may overlook valuable advice, resulting in a lack of incentive for
>>>>>>>>>> them to respond or take official action, and the chapters will have no
>>>>>>>>>> other avenue to voice these concerns.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -ed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just an ISOC member
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:51 AM Barry Leiba via
>>>>>>>>>> Chapter-delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm responding to something in Luis's note, but it's not really a
>>>>>>>>>>> response to Luis -- it's a clarification of what the roles are.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >  Our BOT elected members (and of course, IETF and OMAC ones if
>>>>>>>>>>> isolated) are a minority in the Board
>>>>>>>>>>> > and they are promptly remembered that they are not
>>>>>>>>>>> representing a sector but the Internet Society as a
>>>>>>>>>>> > whole, as written in the legal framework.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the record: I'm a trustee who was elected by the
>>>>>>>>>>> Organization Members.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> First, on the "minority" point, I want to highlight that the
>>>>>>>>>>> Organization Members used to select half the board, six members.
>>>>>>>>>>> Three each were selected by the Chapters and by the Standards
>>>>>>>>>>> Community (the IETF, trustees appointed by the IAB).  This change
>>>>>>>>>>> around ten years ago to the current balance -- one Organization
>>>>>>>>>>> selection was transferred to the Chapters, and one to the IETF
>>>>>>>>>>> -- so
>>>>>>>>>>> we now have each of the three communities having an equal say
>>>>>>>>>>> (four
>>>>>>>>>>> trustees each) in the constitution of the board.  We also have a
>>>>>>>>>>> thirteenth trustee now (Funke Baruwa), who was appointed by the
>>>>>>>>>>> board
>>>>>>>>>>> itself and whose background lies outside all three of those
>>>>>>>>>>> communities.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Second, as Luis said and which can't be stressed enough, once
>>>>>>>>>>> any of
>>>>>>>>>>> us becomes a trustee we are not representing the community that
>>>>>>>>>>> put us
>>>>>>>>>>> here: we are representing the Internet Society itself and acting
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> the interest of the Society as a whole.  We have both a legal and
>>>>>>>>>>> moral responsibility to do that.  Of course, we each come with
>>>>>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>>>>> respective individual backgrounds and experience, which certainly
>>>>>>>>>>> affects our individual views, and that diversity is crucial in
>>>>>>>>>>> getting
>>>>>>>>>>> a broad global perspective.  Sometimes that means that we have
>>>>>>>>>>> different views of what is best for the Society.  But it doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> change the basic truth that we are all acting not as
>>>>>>>>>>> representatives
>>>>>>>>>>> of the communities we came from, but as trustees of the Internet
>>>>>>>>>>> Society.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Third, the board's role is never to manage operational decisions
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> running the Society -- that's the job of the Internet Society
>>>>>>>>>>> management.  It is to work with the Society to set strategic
>>>>>>>>>>> direction, to oversee the mission of the Society.  A board that
>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> micromanage things would be overstepping its role and would be
>>>>>>>>>>> toxic
>>>>>>>>>>> to the health of the organization, whose management has to have
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> freedom and flexibility to handle day-to-day operations as it
>>>>>>>>>>> sees
>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate, within the strategic plan that we worked with them
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> create.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Barry Leiba
>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Society trustee
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>>>>>>>>>>> subscribed
>>>>>>>>>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>>>>>>>>>>> Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
>>>>>>>>>>> https://community.internetsociety.org.
>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> *Notice*: This email may contain confidential information, is
>>>>>>>>>> subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
>>>>>>>>>> addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
>>>>>>>>>> disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
>>>>>>>>>> mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>>>>>>>>>> subscribed
>>>>>>>>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>>>>>>>>>> Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
>>>>>>>>>> https://community.internetsociety.org.
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically
>>>>>>>>> subscribed
>>>>>>>>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet
>>>>>>>>> Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
>>>>>>>>> https://community.internetsociety.org.
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct:
>>>>>>>>> https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> *Caleb Ogundele*
>>>>>>>> Email: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> As a Chapter Leader, you are automatically added to the Internet Society’s
> Chapter Leaders Community Group and the Chapter Delegates e-list, which is
> regularly synchronized with the Internet Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
> https://community.internetsociety.org.
> The Internet Society has a legitimate interest to communicate with its
> chapter leaders, you will therefore remain subscribed for the duration of
> your term and will be unsubscribed automatically when your term ends.
> Please note that the archive of this list is publicly accessible and may
> be viewed by anyone. By submitting information to this list and
> contributing to the communications, you acknowledge that the contents will
> be publicly visible.
> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct:
> https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://elists.isoc.org/pipermail/chapter-delegates/attachments/20250206/12cebf87/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Chapter-delegates mailing list