[Chapter-delegates] Internet Pulse and data sources

[Hank Nussbacher]

On 08/03/2024 15:43, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via Chapter-delegates wrote:

I was recently going over the Internet Society Pulse data and remembered 
Olivier's posting from a few months ago:
>
>
> 3.4 MANRS
> ISOC made a total divestment of its MANRS project to a US 
> not-for-profit, The Global Cyber Alliance (GCA) - and Andrew's 
> response was that this was needed because "ISOC is a good incubator 
> but terrible at running long term projects".
>
> 3.4.1 Why was this divestiture effected given that this was a 
> successful project which comforted the ISOC brand as being pertinent?
>
> 3.4.2 Was a risk assessment done prior to moving MANRS elsewhere to an 
> organisation so close to law enforcement as to ensuring that the 
> Internet Society goals and principles in this important area remain at 
> the top of the routing security agenda?
>
> 3.4.3 By what criteria was the GCA chosen as an suitable organisation 
> to run the MANRS project? Were there conditions imposed on Goals?
>
> 3.4.4 Are there Performance Agreements (SLAs) in place for the ongoing 
> conditional funding of the GCA?
> 3.4.4.1 If yes, are there clauses to cancel the GCA Secretarial and 
> Operational duties, should it fail in its SLAs?


https://pulse.internetsociety.org/reports-faq

and noticed that for Routing Security Adoption and Routing Security 
Coverage for IPv4 and Routing Security Coverage for IPv6,

ISOC uses data from APNIC rather than from their own collected MANRS data:

https://observatory.manrs.org/#/roas/

Is there a reason for that?


Thanks,

Hank