[Chapter-delegates] ISOC's regional engagement

[Desiree Miloshevic]

I hold a similar perspective to Vint’s suggesting that it could be beneficial for ISOC to articulate the reasons behind its need to diversify its sources of funding
particularly in terms of public support and especially among Chapter leadership. 
This would involve clarifying why there is a necessity to secure additional annual funds and specifying the required amount.

Desiree
--

> On 20 Sep 2023, at 13:52, vinton cerf via Chapter-delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
> 
> Olivier, et al,
> to maintain 501(c)(3) status in the US (ie tax credit for donors to the organization), ISOC has to show broad support from the public. The significant income from PIR operations cannot be fully transferred to ISOC without overwhelming the requirement that 33 1/3 % of income to ISOC must come from "public" sources which can include private and corporate donors. If ISOC receives more than 2/3 of its operating income from PIR, it puts the public charity status of ISOC at risk. If not all of the net income of PIR can go to ISOC, it ends up in a fund accumulating at PIR which can be spent only on other 501(c)(3) entities but not on ISOC because of the public support statistics. There is another 10% threshold that can work temporarily (more details), but this is not a permanent solution. The only solution is to raise more public funding. I think ISOC might find it helpful to explain this in its web pages to dispel the misunderstanding that the .org/PIR income solves all problems for ISOC.

> 
> 
> Andrew, please correct me if I have misstated this. 
> 
> v
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:50 AM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via Chapter-delegates <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org <mailto:chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>> wrote:
> Dear Andrew,
> 
> 
> On 15/09/2023 19:59, Andrew Sullivan via Chapter-delegates wrote:
>> Our income is not keeping up with our expenses and we have not been able to attract the level of public support that we need to do, and there isn't anything else left to cut, so we had to make a difficult decision about where to retrench.
> 
> Thank you for your explanatory note. Always sad to see people go. One thing that caught my eye was the above sentence which contains some ambiguities. Would you please be so kind to flesh this out? I just do not want to misinterpret the first part of the sentence relating to income and public support.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Olivier Crépin-Leblond
> UK England Chapter
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
> https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login <https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login>
> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct: https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/ <https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/>
> _______________________________________________
> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society Chapter Portal (AMS):
> https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login
> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct: https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20230921/88ddaf0e/attachment.htm>