[Chapter-delegates] [2021-2022-fincomm] Something to contemlate

[Ted Hardie]

Hi Dave,

First, it's not clear to me to whom you wish this forwarded, and if you
would like me to forward it, that would be helpful information.

Second, it's common practice in the U.S. to permit donors to choose whether
to have their names listed as benefactors of a specific non-profit or
charity event.   The common reason for that is simple: to avoid being
inundated with other requests for funds from non-profits who, seeing your
support for a related organization, decide to explore whether you'd also
support them.  I have personally made anonymous donations for exactly this
reason.

You appear to want this in part because of a belief that the donors are
getting influence over the work of ISOC as a result of the donation.  I
don't think that's a warranted conclusion, in part because the list of
donors is not generally bruited about.  Since the board generally doesn't
see the list of donors, to take one example, even an unconscious desire to
modify the work of the society to satisfy the donors is not really
possible.

Your anecdote below is about a specific chapter which, as you know, are
distinct organizations.  If you have concerns about their management of
their donor rolls, it might be worth chatting with them about it directly.

regards,

Ted Hardie


On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 3:03 AM Dave Burstein <daveb at dslprime.com> wrote:

> Ted
>
> Any policy advocacy organization that hides its sources of funding without
> a darn good reason resembles astroturf. There is no shame or likely
> persecution for contributing to the Internet Society that should require
> hiding our donors. We should always have been open about who pays our
> bills.
>
> If anyone, board or member, objects to disclosing our contributors, please
> speak publicly or write on this list within ten days. In particular, if
> anyone on the chapters or organizations committees has an important
> disagreement, please speak up within ten days.
>
> If there is no substantive objection, please circulate to the board a
> simple resolution, perhaps
> "The CEO shall periodically make publicly available a list of donors to
> the Internet Society of over $5,000 with the amount they have donated."
>
> As everyone who has been active in the Internet Society knows, donor
> influence has long been a concern. For example, David Vyorst, then Chair of
> the DC Chapter, told me he agreed with me on a Net Neutrality proposal and
> his chapter would like to support it. But, "We're looking to get Verizon to
> fund our next event and we need them."  There are many other examples;
> fundraising in DC policy circles is about influence.
>
> It's time for a strong leader. Some obvious, easy steps that could show
> what side you are on:
>
> End your predecessor's gag order and allow (a moderate number) of member
> comments at the next board meeting
>
> Do something about the increased imbalance of the board, totally dominated
> by the US and allies. Two-thirds of the Internet is in the global South.
> Until we adopt to that WWE will be increasingly ineffective. I'm sure two
> or three board members would step aside to make room. If not, the procedure
> for amending the bylaws for a larger board is straightforward and can be
> done quickly.
>
> We can and should turn on comments on our website, which can be moderated.
> We also can accept blogs from our members. ISOC suffers from only allowing
> the "like-minded" to have a public say.
>
> Forward, please.
>
> Dave Burstein
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:00 PM Andrew Sullivan via Chapter-delegates <
> chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 07:53:48PM -0500, Dave Burstein wrote:
>> >
>> >Please make sure the report contains the details on all contributors of
>> >$5,000 and more, including amounts, and all those paid $200,000 or more.
>>
>> Are you asking for the names/identities of such contributors?  That would
>> be a change in practice (these are not historically included in the 990
>> that is released for inspection), so I think it probably requires a
>> resolution by the board after a consultation with the relevant advisory
>> committees.
>>
>> If that's not what you meant, please elucidate.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> A
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> President & CEO, Internet Society
>> sullivan at isoc.org
>> +1 416 731 1261
>> _______________________________________________
>> As an Internet Society Chapter Officer you are automatically subscribed
>> to this list, which is regularly synchronized with the Internet Society
>> Chapter Portal (AMS):
>> https://admin.internetsociety.org/622619/User/Login
>> View the Internet Society Code of Conduct:
>> https://www.internetsociety.org/become-a-member/code-of-conduct/
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20211123/800dbfea/attachment.htm>