[Chapter-delegates] Happy anniversary membernova initiative, was: Meetings on membernova March 3 , 5

[Christine Saegesser]

Dear Klaus,
As mentioned yesterday, we will share an overview next week of all the improvements that were implemented over the last few months that were not linked to data privacy, and there were indeed quite a few of these. We will be in touch on this with all Chapter AMS Administrators.
And, as stated, we want to ensure a comprehensive approach to the organisation's data privacy policy and this is what we are working on. This includes topics such as the one you mention below, which we'll make sure are addressed and we're grateful for any constructive pointers that we get from community members.
At this stage though and given the work that is in progress as mentioned above, I kindly ask you to reach out to either Nick or myself directly if you wish to discuss anything in particular in relation to this before we can share that work with the wider community.
Thank you!

Christine


From: Klaus Birkenbihl <Klaus.Birkenbihl at isoc.de>
Date: Tuesday, 9 March 2021 at 15:13
To: Christine Saegesser <saegesser at isoc.org>
Cc: "chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org" <chapter-delegates at elists.isoc.org>
Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] Happy anniversary membernova initiative, was: Meetings on membernova March 3 , 5


Dear Christine,
Christine Saegesser schrieb am 09.03.21 um 11:28:

On the other hand, and as discussed in the past, the specific questions you are referring to below are not purely technical in nature but are linked to data privacy considerations.



Please know that the Internet Society is in the process of doing an in-depth legal review of its data privacy policy to come up with a comprehensive approach. The results of this analysis are currently undergoing internal review and will be shared with the Chapter Advisory Council and the wider Chapter leaders community later on in the process.

Sorry Christine - are you kidding me? I heard this song before (last time in October). Please understand: most requests on the table don't touch privacy issues at all. Privacy is about which data is collected and exchanged for which purpose on on which legal basis. We talking about ways to make the exchange of data between chapters and isoc.org less cumbersome and more secure - independent of the kind of data we exchange. So with all due respect - this is a flimsy excuse.
Best regards

Klaus

PS.: Respecting privacy is obviously not too high ranked on Internet Society's agenda. E.g.: in July 2019 I flagged up that the Internet Society Cookie banner does not provide an option to refuse consent (IMHO in conflict with our own principles and also not conforming to EU ruling). Meanwhile most orgs and enterprises in the world have adopted their banners to EU ruling. Not so the Internet Society. Instead people are referred to e.g. https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2018/01/lazy-persons-guide-better-online-privacy/ in the Cookie policy. Embarrassed?

--

Klaus Birkenbihl

Internet Society German Chapter (ISOC.DE) e.V.

c/o ict-Media GmbH

https://www.isoc.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20210310/48dc4a2f/attachment.htm>