[Chapter-delegates] New version of ICANN At-Large Review - ISOC Chapters role and future

[Richard Hill]

Dear Alejandro,


Thank you for the clarification.

Best,

Richard

 

From: Alejandro Pisanty [mailto:apisanty at gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 21:01
To: Richard Hill
Cc: ISOC Chapter Delegates
Subject: Re: [Chapter-delegates] New version of ICANN At-Large Review - ISOC Chapters role and future

 

Richard,

 

the "enhanced membership model" proposed for the ICANN At Large Review is a throwback to the original constitution of the At Large by individuals (also the IDNO or Individual Domain Name-Holders Organization), which failed spectacularly. 

 

It took lots of hard work to designn and put in place the present concept based on organizations and a "Web of Trust". It is sadly true that it is a corporativist design with a nnumber of probelms of its own. However, instead of fixing its problems, the proposal "throws away the baby with the bathwater." 

 

Problems like capture by a few individuals will not be solved and in fact most likely will be aggravated by the "enhanced membership model."

 

Alejandro Pisanty

 

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Richard Hill <rhill at hill-a.ch> wrote:

Dear Alejandro,


Thank you for this. I’m sure that some members of ISOC-CH will comment.


Can you please elaborate on the reasons for which you consider the “enhanced membership model” to be deeply flawed?

 

Thanks again and best,

Richard

 

From: Chapter-delegates [mailto:chapter-delegates-bounces at elists.isoc.org] On Behalf Of Alejandro Pisanty
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 19:47
To: ISOC Chapter Delegates
Subject: [Chapter-delegates] New version of ICANN At-Large Review - ISOC Chapters role and future

 

HI all,

 

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-31jan17-en.pdf has the latest version of the ICANN At-Large Review.

 

I think it is of interest for ISOSC in general and for the chapters very particularly.

 

IMO the document characterizes the role of ISOC chapters in the ICANN At Large in a wrong way and proposes a way forward called the "enhanced membership model" that is deeply flawed. 

 

Have any others of you read it, do you have any comments?

 

Yours,

 

Alejandro Pisanty


 

-- 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .





 

-- 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Facultad de Química UNAM
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD
+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475
Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://elists.isoc.org/mailman/private/chapter-delegates/attachments/20170204/cbf841f1/attachment.htm>